Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Fused $\ell_{1}$ Trend Filtering on Graphs

Vladimir Pastukhov

TL;DR

This paper shows how fused estimator and 1-st order trend filtering are related to each other and proposes a computationally feasible numerical solution with a linear complexity per iteration with respect to the amount of edges in the graph.

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to the fused trend filtering on a general graph, which is a combination of fused estimator and 1-st order trend filtering on a graph. There are two cases of fusion regularisers studied in this work: anisotropic total variation (i.e. fused lasso) and nearly-isotonic restriction. For the trend filtering part we consider general trend filtering on a given graph and Kronecker trend filter for the case of lattice data. We show how these estimators are related to each other and propose a computationally feasible numerical solution with a linear complexity per iteration with respect to the amount of edges in the graph.

Fused $\ell_{1}$ Trend Filtering on Graphs

TL;DR

This paper shows how fused estimator and 1-st order trend filtering are related to each other and proposes a computationally feasible numerical solution with a linear complexity per iteration with respect to the amount of edges in the graph.

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to the fused trend filtering on a general graph, which is a combination of fused estimator and 1-st order trend filtering on a graph. There are two cases of fusion regularisers studied in this work: anisotropic total variation (i.e. fused lasso) and nearly-isotonic restriction. For the trend filtering part we consider general trend filtering on a given graph and Kronecker trend filter for the case of lattice data. We show how these estimators are related to each other and propose a computationally feasible numerical solution with a linear complexity per iteration with respect to the amount of edges in the graph.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 4 theorems, 70 equations, 6 figures)

This paper contains 8 sections, 4 theorems, 70 equations, 6 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

For a fixed data vector $\bm{y} \in \mathbb{R}^{n}$ indexed by the index set $\mathcal{I}$ with the partial order relation $\preceq$ defined on $\mathcal{I}$ and the penalisation parameters $\lambda_{NI}$, $\lambda_{F}$ and $\lambda_{T}$ the solution to the nearly-isotonic trend filtering in (NITFG) with subject to and solution to the fused lasso trend filtering is with subject to where $D$

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Computational times vs side size of a square grid for ADMM and OSQP algorithms for fused lasso trend filtering for the cases of general trend filtering and Kronecker trend filtering in two dimensional grid.
  • Figure 2: Trend filter and Kronecker trend filter for different values of parameter $\lambda_{T}$.
  • Figure 3: Isotonic regression and nearly-isotonic Kronecker trend filter for different values of parameter $\lambda_{NI}$ and $\lambda_{T}$.
  • Figure 4: Original image, image with missing pixels and noise, and different image filters.
  • Figure 5: Graph $G=(V,E)$ which corresponds to the chain graph.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4
  • proof