Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A note on uniform ultrafilters in a choiceless context

Toshimichi Usuba

TL;DR

This work investigates the behavior of uniform ultrafilters in choiceless set theory, addressing Hayut–Karagila’s questions about how $\mathcal{U}$ can behave at singulars and successors. Using carefully designed symmetric extensions built on large-cardinal assumptions (including supercompact and strongly compact starting points), the authors realize three principal configurations: (i) $\aleph_{\omega+1}$ as the least element of $\mathcal{U}$, (ii) $\aleph_{\omega}$ as the least cardinal not in $\mathcal{U}$, and (iii) $\aleph_{\omega}$ not in $\mathcal{U}$ with every singular $\lambda>\aleph_{\omega}$ of cofinality $\omega$ carrying a uniform ultrafilter. They further show that any attempt to realize mixed patterns (e.g., a gap with $\kappa\notin \mathcal{U}$ but $\lambda\in \mathcal{U}$) entails inner models of measurable cardinals, signaling robust large-cardinal strength. The results illuminate the extent to which $\mathcal{U}$ can be controlled without Choice, and they delineate the boundaries between possibility and necessity in choiceless ultrafilter configurations.

Abstract

In \cite{HK}, Hayut and Karagila asked some questions about uniform ultrafilters in a choiceless context. We provide several answers to their questions.

A note on uniform ultrafilters in a choiceless context

TL;DR

This work investigates the behavior of uniform ultrafilters in choiceless set theory, addressing Hayut–Karagila’s questions about how can behave at singulars and successors. Using carefully designed symmetric extensions built on large-cardinal assumptions (including supercompact and strongly compact starting points), the authors realize three principal configurations: (i) as the least element of , (ii) as the least cardinal not in , and (iii) not in with every singular of cofinality carrying a uniform ultrafilter. They further show that any attempt to realize mixed patterns (e.g., a gap with but ) entails inner models of measurable cardinals, signaling robust large-cardinal strength. The results illuminate the extent to which can be controlled without Choice, and they delineate the boundaries between possibility and necessity in choiceless ultrafilter configurations.

Abstract

In \cite{HK}, Hayut and Karagila asked some questions about uniform ultrafilters in a choiceless context. We provide several answers to their questions.
Paper Structure (6 sections, 5 equations)