Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An improved Quantum Max Cut approximation via matching

Eunou Lee, Ojas Parekh

TL;DR

The paper addresses approximating the maximum energy state of a quantum Hamiltonian, focusing on Quantum Max Cut (QMC) on graphs with $H=\sum_{(i,j)\in E} w_{ij}H_{ij}$ and $H_{ij}=(I-X_i X_j - Y_i Y_j - Z_i Z_j)/4$. It introduces a classical 0.595-approximation that solves the level-2 Quantum Lasserre SDP and rounds via two routes: (i) a product-state rounding in the style of GP19, and (ii) a matching-based construction that places the $2$-qubit singlet $|\psi^-\rangle=(|01\rangle-|10\rangle)/\sqrt{2}$ on a maximum weight matching and uses maximally mixed states on unmatched qubits. The result improves upon prior guarantees for general graphs (0.562) and triangle-free graphs (0.582) while yielding a simpler, largely product-state output; the analysis hinges on monogamy constraints and matching relaxations derived from SDP hierarchies. Overall, the work demonstrates a provably strong classical approximation for QMC and sheds light on how SDP-guided rounding and matching-based strategies can outperform entangled-state approaches in this setting.

Abstract

Finding a high (or low) energy state of a given quantum Hamiltonian is a potential area to gain a provable and practical quantum advantage. A line of recent studies focuses on Quantum Max Cut, where one is asked to find a high energy state of a given antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Hamiltonian. In this work, we present a classical approximation algorithm for Quantum Max Cut that achieves an approximation ratio of 0.595, outperforming the previous best algorithms of Lee [Lee, 2022] (0.562, generic input graph) and King [King, 2023] (0.582, triangle-free input graph). The algorithm is based on finding the maximum weighted matching of an input graph and outputs a product of at most 2-qubit states, which is simpler than the fully entangled output states of the previous best algorithms.

An improved Quantum Max Cut approximation via matching

TL;DR

The paper addresses approximating the maximum energy state of a quantum Hamiltonian, focusing on Quantum Max Cut (QMC) on graphs with and . It introduces a classical 0.595-approximation that solves the level-2 Quantum Lasserre SDP and rounds via two routes: (i) a product-state rounding in the style of GP19, and (ii) a matching-based construction that places the -qubit singlet on a maximum weight matching and uses maximally mixed states on unmatched qubits. The result improves upon prior guarantees for general graphs (0.562) and triangle-free graphs (0.582) while yielding a simpler, largely product-state output; the analysis hinges on monogamy constraints and matching relaxations derived from SDP hierarchies. Overall, the work demonstrates a provably strong classical approximation for QMC and sheds light on how SDP-guided rounding and matching-based strategies can outperform entangled-state approaches in this setting.

Abstract

Finding a high (or low) energy state of a given quantum Hamiltonian is a potential area to gain a provable and practical quantum advantage. A line of recent studies focuses on Quantum Max Cut, where one is asked to find a high energy state of a given antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Hamiltonian. In this work, we present a classical approximation algorithm for Quantum Max Cut that achieves an approximation ratio of 0.595, outperforming the previous best algorithms of Lee [Lee, 2022] (0.562, generic input graph) and King [King, 2023] (0.582, triangle-free input graph). The algorithm is based on finding the maximum weighted matching of an input graph and outputs a product of at most 2-qubit states, which is simpler than the fully entangled output states of the previous best algorithms.
Paper Structure (2 sections, 7 theorems, 25 equations, 1 figure, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 2 sections, 7 theorems, 25 equations, 1 figure, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Given a feasible solution to the level-2 Lasserre SDP on a graph $G=(V,E)$, for any vertex $i \in V$ and any $S\subseteq V$, In particular, where $N(i)= \{j| (i,j) \in E\}.$

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The solid region represents a feasible area characterized by entanglement convexgamy whereas the red line represents the boundary of the feasible region by monogamy of entanglement on a star.

Theorems & Definitions (15)

  • Definition 1: Level-$k$ Quantum Lasserre SDP
  • Definition 2
  • Definition 3: SDP solution values
  • Lemma 1: Monogamy of entanglement on a star, PT21-lev2
  • Lemma 2: Monogamy of entanglement on a triangle, Lemma 1 of PT22
  • Lemma 3: Entanglement convexgamy on 2 edges
  • proof
  • Theorem 1: Linear program for Maximum Weight Matching, Ed65
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • ...and 5 more