Optimal Nonparametric Inference on Network Effects with Dependent Edges
Wenqin Du, Yuan Zhang, Wen Zhou
TL;DR
This paper develops a fully nonparametric framework for testing network effects in directed, weighted networks with dependent edges by leveraging the Aldous–Hoover exchangeable representation. It addresses the challenge of indeterminate degeneracy in network U-statistics through a novel U-statistics reduction, and provides Berry–Esseen type bounds for finite-sample type I error control, along with minimax-type results for test power. The methodology covers four network effects, offering degeneracy diagnostics and separate non-degenerate and degenerate inference procedures with reduced-network moments to ensure computational scalability and robustness. An empirical evaluation on simulated data and real faculty hiring networks demonstrates substantial speed, accuracy, and robustness advantages over SRM-based methods, with practically meaningful findings such as strong same-sender effects and reciprocity in real networks.
Abstract
Testing network effects in weighted directed networks is a foundational problem in econometrics, sociology, and psychology. Yet, the prevalent edge dependency poses a significant methodological challenge. Most existing methods are model-based and come with stringent assumptions, limiting their applicability. In response, we introduce a novel, fully nonparametric framework that requires only minimal regularity assumptions. While inspired by recent developments in $U$-statistic literature (arXiv:1712.00771, arXiv:2004.06615), our approach notably broadens their scopes. Specifically, we identified and carefully addressed the challenge of indeterminate degeneracy in the test statistics $-$ a problem that aforementioned tools do not handle. We established Berry-Esseen type bound for the accuracy of type-I error rate control. Using original analysis, we also proved the minimax optimality of our test's power. Simulations underscore the superiority of our method in computation speed, accuracy, and numerical robustness compared to competing methods. We also applied our method to the U.S. faculty hiring network data and discovered intriguing findings.
