Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Index concepts for linear differential-algebraic equations in finite and infinite dimensions

Mehmet Erbay, Birgit Jacob, Kirsten Morris, Timo Reis, Caren Tischendorf

TL;DR

The paper investigates index concepts for linear differential-algebraic equations on Banach spaces, defining six indices—resolvent, chain, radiality, nilpotency, differentiation, and perturbation—and establishing key comparisons: $p_{\rm rad}^{(E,A)}+1 \ge p_{\rm res}^{(E,A)} \ge p_{\rm nilp}^{(E,A)} = p_{\rm diff}^{(E,A)} = p_{\rm chain}^{(E,A)}$, with potential equality including $p_{\rm pert}^{(E,A)}$ when $A_1$ generates a $C_0$-semigroup. The analysis relies on the Weierstraß form and invariance under equivalence, showing that unlike finite-dimensional DAEs, indices may not all exist or be equivalent in infinite dimensions; under additional semigroup conditions, a stronger chain of equalities emerges. The work also introduces and situates each index (resolvent, chain, radiality, nilpotency, differentiation, perturbation) within a unified framework, relates them to well-posedness and Weierstraß theory, and provides examples illustrating possible disparities. Overall, the paper delineates what indices are meaningful in Banach-space DAEs, highlights their limitations, and outlines open questions about existence, equality, and practical relevance for infinite-dimensional systems.

Abstract

Different index concepts for linear differential-algebraic equations are defined in the general Banach space setting, and compared. For regular finite-dimensional linear differential-algebraic equations, all these indices exist and are equivalent. For infinite-dimensional systems, the situation is more complex. It is proven that although some indices imply others, in general they are not equivalent. The situation is illustrated with a number of examples.

Index concepts for linear differential-algebraic equations in finite and infinite dimensions

TL;DR

The paper investigates index concepts for linear differential-algebraic equations on Banach spaces, defining six indices—resolvent, chain, radiality, nilpotency, differentiation, and perturbation—and establishing key comparisons: , with potential equality including when generates a -semigroup. The analysis relies on the Weierstraß form and invariance under equivalence, showing that unlike finite-dimensional DAEs, indices may not all exist or be equivalent in infinite dimensions; under additional semigroup conditions, a stronger chain of equalities emerges. The work also introduces and situates each index (resolvent, chain, radiality, nilpotency, differentiation, perturbation) within a unified framework, relates them to well-posedness and Weierstraß theory, and provides examples illustrating possible disparities. Overall, the paper delineates what indices are meaningful in Banach-space DAEs, highlights their limitations, and outlines open questions about existence, equality, and practical relevance for infinite-dimensional systems.

Abstract

Different index concepts for linear differential-algebraic equations are defined in the general Banach space setting, and compared. For regular finite-dimensional linear differential-algebraic equations, all these indices exist and are equivalent. For infinite-dimensional systems, the situation is more complex. It is proven that although some indices imply others, in general they are not equivalent. The situation is illustrated with a number of examples.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 13 theorems, 129 equations)

This paper contains 9 sections, 13 theorems, 129 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 3.2

The resolvent index, given that it exists, is uniquely defined. To be more precise, let $(E,A) \sim (\tilde{E}, \tilde{A})$. Then $p_{\mathrm{res}}^{(E,A)}=p_{\mathrm{res}}^{(\tilde{E},\tilde{A})}$ and $p_{\mathrm{c,res}}^{(E,A)}=p_{\mathrm{c,res}}^{(\tilde{E},\tilde{A})}$.

Theorems & Definitions (46)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Definition 3.1: resolvent index
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.3
  • proof
  • Example 3.4
  • Example 3.5
  • ...and 36 more