Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Impacts of {$f(R, T)$} gravity on neutron stars study within the relativistic mean-field model framework in light of GW170817, Pulsars and NICER data

Premachand Mahapatra, Prasanta Kumar Das

TL;DR

This study tests neutron star structure in conservative $f(R,T)$ gravity with $f(R,T)=R+\lambda T$ using realistic RMF EOSs and multimessenger constraints. By solving the modified TOV equations and comparing with GW170817, NICER, and massive pulsars, the authors identify which density-dependent RMF EOSs (e.g., DDH$_{\delta}$, TW) can satisfy the data for specific $\lambda$ values, while nonlinear EOSs fail. They show that the maximum mass is highly sensitive to the matter–geometry coupling and degenerate with the EOS, and that causality remains preserved, but modified gravity cannot compensate for unrealistically stiff dense-matter physics. The work highlights the necessity of realistic EOSs and joint multimessenger constraints, while establishing conservative $f(R,T)$ gravity as a viable strong-field extension of GR.

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the neutron star structure in conservative $f(R, T)$ gravity with $f(R, T)=R+λT$, where $λ$ denotes the matter--geometry coupling. The modified stellar structure equations are solved using realistic relativistic mean-field (RMF) equations of state (EOSs), including density-dependent linear models and nonlinear interacting models with meson self-couplings. Theoretical predictions are confronted with multimessenger constraints from heavy pulsars, NICER radius measurements, and GW170817 tidal deformability, imposing $M_{\max}\simeq 2.07\, M_{\odot}$ and $10.62~\mathrm{km}<R_{1.4}<12.83~\mathrm{km}$ to constrain both the EOS parameter space and $λ$. We find that density-dependent EOSs such as DDH$_δ$ and TW satisfy all observational constraints for specific $λ$ ranges, while nonlinear EOSs (NL3, GM1, TM1), despite large maximum masses, fail to simultaneously satisfy radius and tidal bounds even in modified gravity. The maximum neutron star mass is highly sensitive to the matter--geometry coupling and exhibits a strong degeneracy with the EOS, consistent with previous studies. The additional term in the modified Tolman--Oppenheimer--Volkoff equations alters the pressure gradient, affecting EOS stiffness and the speed of sound squared $c_s^2$, while preserving causality ($c_s^2/c^2<1$). Pearson and Kendall analyses reveal a strong negative correlation between mass, radius, and $λ$ ($-0.18$ and $-0.23$, respectively). Our results show that modified gravity alone cannot compensate for unrealistic dense-matter physics, highlighting the necessity of realistic EOSs and joint multimessenger constraints, and establish conservative $f(R,T)$ gravity as a viable strong-field extension of General Relativity.

Impacts of {$f(R, T)$} gravity on neutron stars study within the relativistic mean-field model framework in light of GW170817, Pulsars and NICER data

TL;DR

This study tests neutron star structure in conservative gravity with using realistic RMF EOSs and multimessenger constraints. By solving the modified TOV equations and comparing with GW170817, NICER, and massive pulsars, the authors identify which density-dependent RMF EOSs (e.g., DDH, TW) can satisfy the data for specific values, while nonlinear EOSs fail. They show that the maximum mass is highly sensitive to the matter–geometry coupling and degenerate with the EOS, and that causality remains preserved, but modified gravity cannot compensate for unrealistically stiff dense-matter physics. The work highlights the necessity of realistic EOSs and joint multimessenger constraints, while establishing conservative gravity as a viable strong-field extension of GR.

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the neutron star structure in conservative gravity with , where denotes the matter--geometry coupling. The modified stellar structure equations are solved using realistic relativistic mean-field (RMF) equations of state (EOSs), including density-dependent linear models and nonlinear interacting models with meson self-couplings. Theoretical predictions are confronted with multimessenger constraints from heavy pulsars, NICER radius measurements, and GW170817 tidal deformability, imposing and to constrain both the EOS parameter space and . We find that density-dependent EOSs such as DDH and TW satisfy all observational constraints for specific ranges, while nonlinear EOSs (NL3, GM1, TM1), despite large maximum masses, fail to simultaneously satisfy radius and tidal bounds even in modified gravity. The maximum neutron star mass is highly sensitive to the matter--geometry coupling and exhibits a strong degeneracy with the EOS, consistent with previous studies. The additional term in the modified Tolman--Oppenheimer--Volkoff equations alters the pressure gradient, affecting EOS stiffness and the speed of sound squared , while preserving causality (). Pearson and Kendall analyses reveal a strong negative correlation between mass, radius, and ( and , respectively). Our results show that modified gravity alone cannot compensate for unrealistic dense-matter physics, highlighting the necessity of realistic EOSs and joint multimessenger constraints, and establish conservative gravity as a viable strong-field extension of General Relativity.
Paper Structure (18 sections, 36 equations, 8 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 18 sections, 36 equations, 8 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Pressure $P(\rho)$ (in $MeV/fm^3$) vs Energy Density $\rho$ (in $MeV/fm^3$) and Speed of Sound Squared ($c_s^2 / c^2$) vs Number Density ($fm^{-3}$) for all of the given RMF model EOS
  • Figure 2: Mass($M_\odot$) vs Radius ($R$) and Mass($M_\odot$) vs central energy density $\rho_c$ ($10^{15} g /cm^3$ ) profile for a number of Neutron Stars in the given range of $\rho_c$ for all $6$RMF EOS
  • Figure 3: Mass vs radial coordinate ($r$) and Pressure vs radial coordinate ($r$) profile for a single Neutron star from the core to the surface of the star DD2, DDH$_\delta$, TW EOS
  • Figure 4: Mass vs radial coordinate ($r$) and Pressure vs radial coordinate ($r$) profile for a single Neutron star from the core to the surface of the star NL3, GM1, TM1 EOS
  • Figure 5: Mass($M_\odot$) vs Radius ($R$) for a number of Neutron Stars in the given range of $\rho_c$ for DD2, DDH$_\delta$, TW, NL3, GM1, TM1 EOS
  • ...and 3 more figures