Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On maximal intersection position for logarithmically concave functions and measures

Steven Hoehner, Michael Roysdon

TL;DR

The paper extends the notion of maximal intersection position from convex bodies to pairs of log-concave functions and even log-concave measures, formulating a functional analogue via $P_{f,g}(T,z)$ and proving a John-type decomposition of the identity. A central contribution is establishing the existence of optimizers for the maximal intersection problem, then deriving variational formulas that yield isotropic-type conditions and a two-term decomposition separating nonsingular and boundary contributions; these results hold under weak hypotheses and even permit unbounded supports. The authors further apply the framework to define a John-type position for even log-concave measures, deriving isotropic boundary measures and linking to classical John theory in a functional setting. Together, these results generalize John-type decompositions to the functional/measure context, enabling a principled analysis of log-concave objects in high dimensions and recovering special cases corresponding to indicators of convex bodies.

Abstract

A new position is introduced and studied for the convolution of log-concave functions, which may be regarded as a functional analogue of the maximum intersection position of convex bodies introduced and studied by Artstein-Avidan and Katzin (2018) and Artstein-Avidan and Putterman (2022). Our main result is a John-type theorem for the maximal intersection position of a pair of log-concave functions, including the corresponding decomposition of the identity. The main result holds under very weak assumptions on the functions; in particular, the functions considered may both have unbounded supports. As an application of our results, we introduce a John-type position for even $\log$-concave measures.

On maximal intersection position for logarithmically concave functions and measures

TL;DR

The paper extends the notion of maximal intersection position from convex bodies to pairs of log-concave functions and even log-concave measures, formulating a functional analogue via and proving a John-type decomposition of the identity. A central contribution is establishing the existence of optimizers for the maximal intersection problem, then deriving variational formulas that yield isotropic-type conditions and a two-term decomposition separating nonsingular and boundary contributions; these results hold under weak hypotheses and even permit unbounded supports. The authors further apply the framework to define a John-type position for even log-concave measures, deriving isotropic boundary measures and linking to classical John theory in a functional setting. Together, these results generalize John-type decompositions to the functional/measure context, enabling a principled analysis of log-concave objects in high dimensions and recovering special cases corresponding to indicators of convex bodies.

Abstract

A new position is introduced and studied for the convolution of log-concave functions, which may be regarded as a functional analogue of the maximum intersection position of convex bodies introduced and studied by Artstein-Avidan and Katzin (2018) and Artstein-Avidan and Putterman (2022). Our main result is a John-type theorem for the maximal intersection position of a pair of log-concave functions, including the corresponding decomposition of the identity. The main result holds under very weak assumptions on the functions; in particular, the functions considered may both have unbounded supports. As an application of our results, we introduce a John-type position for even -concave measures.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 18 theorems, 115 equations)

This paper contains 11 sections, 18 theorems, 115 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $K$ be a convex body in $\mathbb{R}^n$ such that $B_2^n\subset K$. Then the following are equivalent:

Theorems & Definitions (38)

  • Theorem A: John's Theorem JohnBall92Ball97
  • Theorem B
  • Definition 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Definition 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • Theorem 6
  • Remark 7
  • Definition 8
  • ...and 28 more