A mean-field game model of electricity market dynamics
Alicia Bassière, Roxana Dumitrescu, Peter Tankov
TL;DR
The paper tackles long-term dynamics in electricity markets under energy-transition pressures by modeling a large population of producers with mean-field games of optimal stopping, incorporating endogenous fuel prices and invest/divest decisions. It extends prior two-technology MF models to multiple conventional and renewable technologies, allows for investment and divestment, and introduces endogenized fuel pricing while ensuring deterministic price paths via a fixed-point scheme. The authors prove existence and uniqueness of equilibrium price trajectories and present a tractable numerical method (linear-programming fictitious play) to compute equilibria, delivering insights into how gas, coal, and renewables substitute over time and how market design and build times affect the transition. The approach yields interpretable outputs (price paths, installed capacity, energy mix, emissions) and provides a framework for policy analysis and market design under realistic energy-transition scenarios, including the 2022 price crisis context.
Abstract
We develop a model for the long-term dynamics of electricity market, based on mean-field games of optimal stopping. Our paper extends the recent contribution [Aïd, René, Roxana Dumitrescu, and Peter Tankov, ``The entry and exit game in the electricity markets: A mean-field game approach." Journal of Dynamics \& Games 8.4 (2021): 331] in several ways, making the model much more realistic, especially for describing the medium-term impacts of energy transition on electricity markets. In particular, we allow for an arbitrary number of technologies with endogenous fuel prices and enable the agents to both invest and divest. This makes it possible to describe the role of gas generation as a medium-term substitute for coal, to be replaced by renewable generation in the long term, and enables us to model the events like the 2022 energy price crisis.
