Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the mixed monotonicity of polynomial functions

Adam M Tahir

TL;DR

This work proves that every univariate polynomial is mixed monotone on the entire real line with a polynomial decomposition function obtained from the Gram-matrix representation of its derivative, enabling a global and potentially tighter decomposition than local Jacobian-based methods. The decomposition is constructed as g(x,y) = q(x) − r(y), where q and r arise from integrating a pair of PSD matrices obtained from the Gram decomposition of p′. Extending to multivariate polynomials, the authors show that products and sums of mixed-monotone components preserve mixed monotonicity, yielding polynomial decompositions for all polynomials. The paper also discusses tightness via semidefinite programming to choose alpha, U, and V, and presents five illustrative examples—including a reachable-set over-approximation—to demonstrate tightness, monotonicity checks, and applicability to interval observers and set propagation. This approach provides a scalable framework for global mixed-monotone decompositions with practical impact on reachability and interval-based estimation of polynomial systems, while outlining avenues for handling uncertainty and further tightening.

Abstract

In this paper, it is shown that every polynomial function is mixed monotone globally with a polynomial decomposition function. For univariate polynomials, the decomposition functions can be constructed from the Gram matrix representation of polynomial functions. The tightness of polynomial decomposition functions is discussed. Several examples are provided. An example is provided to show that polynomial decomposition functions, in addition to being global decomposition functions, can be much tighter than local decomposition functions constructed using local Jacobian bounds. Furthermore, an example is provided to demonstrate the application to reachable set over-approximation.

On the mixed monotonicity of polynomial functions

TL;DR

This work proves that every univariate polynomial is mixed monotone on the entire real line with a polynomial decomposition function obtained from the Gram-matrix representation of its derivative, enabling a global and potentially tighter decomposition than local Jacobian-based methods. The decomposition is constructed as g(x,y) = q(x) − r(y), where q and r arise from integrating a pair of PSD matrices obtained from the Gram decomposition of p′. Extending to multivariate polynomials, the authors show that products and sums of mixed-monotone components preserve mixed monotonicity, yielding polynomial decompositions for all polynomials. The paper also discusses tightness via semidefinite programming to choose alpha, U, and V, and presents five illustrative examples—including a reachable-set over-approximation—to demonstrate tightness, monotonicity checks, and applicability to interval observers and set propagation. This approach provides a scalable framework for global mixed-monotone decompositions with practical impact on reachability and interval-based estimation of polynomial systems, while outlining avenues for handling uncertainty and further tightening.

Abstract

In this paper, it is shown that every polynomial function is mixed monotone globally with a polynomial decomposition function. For univariate polynomials, the decomposition functions can be constructed from the Gram matrix representation of polynomial functions. The tightness of polynomial decomposition functions is discussed. Several examples are provided. An example is provided to show that polynomial decomposition functions, in addition to being global decomposition functions, can be much tighter than local decomposition functions constructed using local Jacobian bounds. Furthermore, an example is provided to demonstrate the application to reachable set over-approximation.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 8 theorems, 46 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 19 sections, 8 theorems, 46 equations, 5 figures.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Let $A\in\mathbb{S}^n$. There exist matrices $U,V\succeq 0$ such that $A=U-V$.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Depiction of the decomposition function \ref{['decompex']} for \ref{['e:example']}.
  • Figure 2: Comparison of the polynomial decomposition function given in \ref{['decompex']} and the decomposition function derived from Jacobian bounds on $\mathcal{X}=\{x:\|x\|\le 2\}$ given in \ref{['e:linmmp']}. The gray lines are the same as shown in Fig. \ref{['f:mm']}.
  • Figure 3: Comparison of the decomposition function \ref{['e:frob']} derived by minimizing \ref{['e:frobob']} and the decomposition function \ref{['e:l1']} derived by minimizing \ref{['e:1normob']}.
  • Figure 4: Plot of the polynomial $p_3$ given in \ref{['monotone']}.
  • Figure 5: Depiction of the over-approximation of the reachable set from the origin computed by propagating \ref{['e:overapp']}. The gray lines are sample trajectories of \ref{['e:dt']} with randomly generated inputs that satisfy the bounds \ref{['e:inputbounds']}.

Theorems & Definitions (19)

  • Definition 1: Definition 2.2 in Parrilo:2003aa
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Remark 1
  • Definition 2: cf. Definition 4 in SuffMixMonotone
  • Proposition 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • ...and 9 more