Equivariant Hilbert and Ehrhart series under translative group actions
Alessio D'Alì, Emanuele Delucchi
TL;DR
The paper develops a unified framework for equivariant Hilbert and Ehrhart theory under finite group actions that are translative, connecting CM Stanley–Reisner rings to unimodular triangulations of lattice polytopes. By combining a Cohen–Macaulay parameter approach with a colorful, coloring-preserving approach, it proves that equivariant Hilbert series have rational expressions with effective numerators and denominators of the form $(1-t)^{d+1}$, and that equivariant Ehrhart series of Polytopes with translative actions equal the corresponding equivariant Hilbert series of their triangulations. These results yield explicit formulas for order polytopes and alcoved polytopes, showing all entries of the equivariant $h$-vector and flag $h$-vector are effective under translative or balanced actions, and enabling practical computations in poset- and Coxeter-theoretic settings. The framework provides a toolkit for computing and understanding representation-theoretic structure in lattice-point enumeration and face-ring contexts, with concrete applications to posets and their associated polytopes.
Abstract
We study representations of finite groups on Stanley--Reisner rings of simplicial complexes and on lattice points in lattice polytopes. The framework of translative group actions allows us to use the theory of proper colorings of simplicial complexes without requiring an explicit coloring to be given. We prove that the equivariant Hilbert series of a Cohen--Macaulay simplicial complex under a translative group action admits a rational expression whose numerator is a positive integer combination of irreducible characters. This implies an analogous rational expression for the equivariant Ehrhart series of a lattice polytope with a unimodular triangulation that is invariant under a translative group action. As an application, we study the equivariant Ehrhart series of alcoved polytopes in the sense of Lam and Postnikov and derive explicit results in the case of order polytopes and of Lipschitz poset polytopes.
