Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy Labels

Jonathan Wilton, Nan Ye

TL;DR

Addresses learning decision trees under label noise. Introduces conservative losses and distribution losses, including the adaptive negative exponential (NE) loss, with a tunable robustness parameter. Shows that conservative losses induce early stopping and majority-class robustness, and that ANE delivers strong, noise-tolerant performance across both decision trees and random forests for binary and multiclass tasks. The framework unifies existing losses and provides a scalable, tunable solution with public code.

Abstract

We consider training decision trees using noisily labeled data, focusing on loss functions that can lead to robust learning algorithms. Our contributions are threefold. First, we offer novel theoretical insights on the robustness of many existing loss functions in the context of decision tree learning. We show that some of the losses belong to a class of what we call conservative losses, and the conservative losses lead to an early stopping behavior during training and noise-tolerant predictions during testing. Second, we introduce a framework for constructing robust loss functions, called distribution losses. These losses apply percentile-based penalties based on an assumed margin distribution, and they naturally allow adapting to different noise rates via a robustness parameter. In particular, we introduce a new loss called the negative exponential loss, which leads to an efficient greedy impurity-reduction learning algorithm. Lastly, our experiments on multiple datasets and noise settings validate our theoretical insight and the effectiveness of our adaptive negative exponential loss.

Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy Labels

TL;DR

Addresses learning decision trees under label noise. Introduces conservative losses and distribution losses, including the adaptive negative exponential (NE) loss, with a tunable robustness parameter. Shows that conservative losses induce early stopping and majority-class robustness, and that ANE delivers strong, noise-tolerant performance across both decision trees and random forests for binary and multiclass tasks. The framework unifies existing losses and provides a scalable, tunable solution with public code.

Abstract

We consider training decision trees using noisily labeled data, focusing on loss functions that can lead to robust learning algorithms. Our contributions are threefold. First, we offer novel theoretical insights on the robustness of many existing loss functions in the context of decision tree learning. We show that some of the losses belong to a class of what we call conservative losses, and the conservative losses lead to an early stopping behavior during training and noise-tolerant predictions during testing. Second, we introduce a framework for constructing robust loss functions, called distribution losses. These losses apply percentile-based penalties based on an assumed margin distribution, and they naturally allow adapting to different noise rates via a robustness parameter. In particular, we introduce a new loss called the negative exponential loss, which leads to an efficient greedy impurity-reduction learning algorithm. Lastly, our experiments on multiple datasets and noise settings validate our theoretical insight and the effectiveness of our adaptive negative exponential loss.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 20 theorems, 76 equations, 8 figures, 5 tables, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 23 sections, 20 theorems, 76 equations, 8 figures, 5 tables, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $W_{{\cal{S}}}=|{\cal{S}}|/|{\cal{D}}|$ and ${\bm{p}} =(p_1,\ldots,p_K)^{\mathsf{T}} \in \Delta$ be the empirical class probability vector for ${\cal{S}}$, that is, $p_j=\sum_{({\bm{x}},{\bm{y}})\in{\cal{S}}}\mathds{1}({\bm{y}}={\bm{e}}_j)/|{\cal{S}}|,\forall j=1,\ldots,K$. Then,

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Left: NE loss as a function of the margin $y\widehat{y}$. Right: Blue lines are NE impurities with their $\lambda$ values provided in the legend. The special case with $\lambda=1$ is denoted by CL (conservative loss). Red lines are GCE impurities with their $q$ values provided in the legend. The special case with $q = 0$ is denoted by CE (cross entropy). The impurities have been scaled for better comparison.
  • Figure 2: Mean test accuracy with 2x sd bands for DT on binary classification problems using different splitting criteria. Training labels corrupted using uniform noise $\eta\in\{0.0, 0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4\}$ and class conditional noise CC1 $(0.1,0.3)$ and CC2 $(0.2,0.4)$.
  • Figure 3: Mean test accuracy with 2x sd bands for DT on multiclass classification problems using different splitting criteria. Training labels corrupted using uniform noise $\eta\in\{0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4\}$ and class conditional (CC) noise.
  • Figure 4: Mean test accuracy with 2x sd bands for RF on binary classification problems using different splitting criteria. Training labels corrupted using uniform noise $\eta\in\{0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4\}$ and class conditional noise CC1 $(0.1,0.3)$ and CC2 $(0.2,0.4)$.
  • Figure 5: Mean test accuracy with 2x sd bands for RF on multiclass classification problems using different splitting criteria. Training labels corrupted using uniform noise $\eta\in\{0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4\}$ and class conditional (CC) noise.
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (32)

  • Theorem 1
  • Definition 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Corollary 2.1
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • Lemma 5
  • Lemma 5
  • Theorem 6
  • ...and 22 more