Hyperarithmetical Complexity of Infinitary Action Logic with Multiplexing
Tikhon Pshenitsyn
TL;DR
The paper determines the precise algorithmic complexity of derivability for the infinitary action logic with multiplexing $!^m\\nabla \\mathrm{ACT}_\\omega$, proving $\\Delta^0_{\\omega^\\omega}$-completeness under Turing reductions by establishing a computable isomorphism with the satisfaction predicate for computable infinitary formulas of rank $<\\omega^\\omega$. It shows the closure ordinal of this calculus is $\\omega^\\omega$ and extends the analysis to the $!^m\\nabla \\mathrm{ACT}_\\omega^-$ fragment and to a family of depth-bounded fragments with complexities between $\\Delta^0_{\\omega^k}$ and $\\Delta^0_{\\omega^{k+1}}$, converging to $\\Delta^0_{\\omega^\\omega}$ as $k$ grows. The core method encodes a low-level program inside the logic and uses a bottom–top analysis of derivations together with effective transfinite recursion to relate derivability to the hyperarithmetical hierarchy. The results illuminate a unique complexity level for a natural propositional logic with subexponentials and multiplexing, with potential implications for formal linguistics and computability theory.
Abstract
In 2023, Kuznetsov and Speranski introduced infinitary action logic with multiplexing $!^m\nabla \mathrm{ACT}_ω$ and proved that the derivability problem for it lies between the $ω$ and $ω^ω$ levels of the hyperarithmetical hierarchy. We prove that this problem is $Δ^0_{ω^ω}$-complete under Turing reductions. Namely, we show that it is recursively isomorphic to the satisfaction predicate for computable infinitary formulas of rank less than $ω^ω$ in the language of arithmetic. As a consequence we prove that the closure ordinal for $!^m\nabla \mathrm{ACT}_ω$ equals $ω^ω$. We also prove that the fragment of $!^m\nabla \mathrm{ACT}_ω$ where Kleene star is not allowed to be in the scope of the subexponential is $Δ^0_{ω^ω}$-complete. Finally, we present a family of logics, which are fragments of $!^m\nabla \mathrm{ACT}_ω$, such that the complexity of the $k$-th logic lies between $Δ^0_{ω^k}$ and $Δ^0_{ω^{k+1}}$.
