Table of Contents
Fetching ...

New Online Communities: Graph Deep Learning on Anonymous Voting Networks to Identify Sybils in Polycentric Governance

Quinn DuPont

TL;DR

DAOs face significant Sybil challenges due to anonymous voting, which can distort governance. The authors develop a graph deep learning pipeline that learns node embeddings with a GCNN and clusters them via FAISS to identify Sybil activity in Snapshot governance data, achieving a 2-5% reduction in the voting graph without requiring new identity systems. Framed within Ostrom-inspired Digital Common Pool Resources and polycentric governance, the work links neoinstitutional theory to practical forensics for digital asset commons. The approach offers scalable, privacy-preserving avenues for improving governance integrity, with implications for policy, regulation, and the design of resilient decentralized communities.

Abstract

This research examines the polycentric governance of digital assets in blockchain-based Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). It offers a theoretical framework and addresses a critical challenge facing decentralized governance by developing a method to identify Sybils, or spurious identities. Sybils pose significant organizational sustainability threats to DAOs and other, commons-based online communities, and threat models are identified. The experimental method uses an autoencoder architecture and graph deep learning techniques to identify Sybil activity in a DAO governance dataset (snapshot.org). Specifically, a Graph Convolutional Neural Network (GCNN) learned voting behaviours and a fast vector clustering algorithm used high-dimensional embeddings to identify similar nodes in a graph. The results reveal that deep learning can effectively identify Sybils, reducing the voting graph by 2-5%. This research underscores the importance of Sybil resistance in DAOs, identifies challenges and opportunities for forensics and analysis of anonymous networks, and offers a novel perspective on decentralized governance, informing future policy, regulation, and governance practices.

New Online Communities: Graph Deep Learning on Anonymous Voting Networks to Identify Sybils in Polycentric Governance

TL;DR

DAOs face significant Sybil challenges due to anonymous voting, which can distort governance. The authors develop a graph deep learning pipeline that learns node embeddings with a GCNN and clusters them via FAISS to identify Sybil activity in Snapshot governance data, achieving a 2-5% reduction in the voting graph without requiring new identity systems. Framed within Ostrom-inspired Digital Common Pool Resources and polycentric governance, the work links neoinstitutional theory to practical forensics for digital asset commons. The approach offers scalable, privacy-preserving avenues for improving governance integrity, with implications for policy, regulation, and the design of resilient decentralized communities.

Abstract

This research examines the polycentric governance of digital assets in blockchain-based Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). It offers a theoretical framework and addresses a critical challenge facing decentralized governance by developing a method to identify Sybils, or spurious identities. Sybils pose significant organizational sustainability threats to DAOs and other, commons-based online communities, and threat models are identified. The experimental method uses an autoencoder architecture and graph deep learning techniques to identify Sybil activity in a DAO governance dataset (snapshot.org). Specifically, a Graph Convolutional Neural Network (GCNN) learned voting behaviours and a fast vector clustering algorithm used high-dimensional embeddings to identify similar nodes in a graph. The results reveal that deep learning can effectively identify Sybils, reducing the voting graph by 2-5%. This research underscores the importance of Sybil resistance in DAOs, identifies challenges and opportunities for forensics and analysis of anonymous networks, and offers a novel perspective on decentralized governance, informing future policy, regulation, and governance practices.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 11 equations, 25 figures, 3 tables)