Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A connection between the $A_α$-spectrum and the Lovász theta number

Gabriel Coutinho, Thiago Oliveira

TL;DR

The paper studies the smallest $\alpha$ for which the matrix $A_\alpha = \alpha D + (1-\alpha) A$ becomes positive semidefinite, revealing a tight connection to the Lovász theta number via $\alpha_0 \ge 1/\vartheta(\overline{G})$. By allowing weighted variations in $A$ and $D$, the authors show $\alpha_0 = 1/\vartheta(\overline{G})$ in this generalized setting and connect this framework to Motzkin–Straus’ quadratic formulation for $\omega(G)$. They further relate $\alpha_0$ to SDP relaxations for max-$k$-cut, yielding bounds that recover $1/\chi(G)$ and extend classical results of Nikiforov–Rojo. A copositive relaxation is introduced, giving $1/\omega(G) \le \alpha_0^{\mathcal{C}} \le 1/2$, with a constructive link to Motzkin–Straus but leaving the exact equality with $1/\omega$ as an open problem. Overall, the work bridges spectral, semidefinite, and copositive formulations to tie the $A_\alpha$-spectrum to fundamental graph parameters.

Abstract

We show that the smallest $α$ so that $αD + (1-α)A \succcurlyeq 0$ is at least $1/\vartheta(\overline{G})$, significantly improving upon a result due to Nikiforov and Rojo (2017). In fact, we display an even stronger connection: if the nonzero entries of $A$ are allowed to vary and those of $D$ vary accordingly, then we show that this smallest $α$ is in fact equal to $1/\vartheta(\overline{G})$. We also show other results obtained as an application of this optimization framework, including a connection to the well-known quadratic formulation for $ω(G)$ due to Motzkin and Straus (1964).

A connection between the $A_α$-spectrum and the Lovász theta number

TL;DR

The paper studies the smallest for which the matrix becomes positive semidefinite, revealing a tight connection to the Lovász theta number via . By allowing weighted variations in and , the authors show in this generalized setting and connect this framework to Motzkin–Straus’ quadratic formulation for . They further relate to SDP relaxations for max--cut, yielding bounds that recover and extend classical results of Nikiforov–Rojo. A copositive relaxation is introduced, giving , with a constructive link to Motzkin–Straus but leaving the exact equality with as an open problem. Overall, the work bridges spectral, semidefinite, and copositive formulations to tie the -spectrum to fundamental graph parameters.

Abstract

We show that the smallest so that is at least , significantly improving upon a result due to Nikiforov and Rojo (2017). In fact, we display an even stronger connection: if the nonzero entries of are allowed to vary and those of vary accordingly, then we show that this smallest is in fact equal to . We also show other results obtained as an application of this optimization framework, including a connection to the well-known quadratic formulation for due to Motzkin and Straus (1964).
Paper Structure (7 sections, 9 theorems, 42 equations)

This paper contains 7 sections, 9 theorems, 42 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1

The optimization problems in eq:alpha-def and eq:dual have the same optimal value.

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Proposition 1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2
  • proof
  • Theorem 3
  • proof
  • Theorem 4
  • proof
  • Proposition 5
  • proof
  • ...and 6 more