Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A note on cube-free problems

Yuchen Meng

TL;DR

The paper studies $d$-cube-free subsets of the cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_N$ with $d\mid N$, proving the conjectured density bound $|A|\leq \frac{d-1}{d}N$ in several important cases and establishing tightness via the residue class example $A=\{a: a\equiv 1,\dots, d-1\pmod{d}\}$. It introduces a constructive matrix- or layer-based framework and leverages the Cauchy–Davenport theorem, along with double counting, to bound the size of cube-free sets. The work further explores related problems including $(x,dx)$-free and $(x,2x,\ldots, dx)$-free sets, deriving upper bounds in $[N]$ and $\mathbb{Z}_N$, and demonstrates the conjecture in notable cases: $d=3$, when $d$ is the smallest prime factor of $N$, and when $N$ is a prime power. These results advance understanding of cube-free phenomena in additive combinatorics and suggest avenues for extending the bounds to broader families of $N$ and $d$.

Abstract

Eberhard and Pohoata conjectured that every $3$-cube-free subset of $[N]$ has size less than $2N/3+o(N)$. In this paper we show that if we replace $[N]$ with $\mathbb{Z}_N$ the upper bound of $2N/3$ holds, and the bound is tight when $N$ is divisible by $3$ since we have $A=\{a\in \mathbb{Z}_N:a\equiv 1,2\pmod{3}\}.$ Inspired by this observation we conjecture that every $d$-cube-free subset of $\mathbb{Z}_N$ has size less than $(d-1)N/d$ where $N$ is divisible by $d$, and we show the tightness of this bound by providing an example $B=\{b\in\mathbb{Z}_N:b\equiv 1,2,\ldots,d-1\pmod{d}\}$. We prove the conjecture for several interesting cases, including when $d$ is the smallest prime factor of $N$, or when $N$ is a prime power. We also discuss some related issues regarding $\{x,dx\}$-free sets and $\{x,2x,\ldots,dx\}$-free sets. A main ingredient we apply is to arrange all the integers into some square matrix, with $m=d^s\times l$ having the coordinate $(s+1,l-\lfloor l/d\rfloor)$. Here $d$ is a given integer and $l$ is not divisible by $d$.

A note on cube-free problems

TL;DR

The paper studies -cube-free subsets of the cyclic group with , proving the conjectured density bound in several important cases and establishing tightness via the residue class example . It introduces a constructive matrix- or layer-based framework and leverages the Cauchy–Davenport theorem, along with double counting, to bound the size of cube-free sets. The work further explores related problems including -free and -free sets, deriving upper bounds in and , and demonstrates the conjecture in notable cases: , when is the smallest prime factor of , and when is a prime power. These results advance understanding of cube-free phenomena in additive combinatorics and suggest avenues for extending the bounds to broader families of and .

Abstract

Eberhard and Pohoata conjectured that every -cube-free subset of has size less than . In this paper we show that if we replace with the upper bound of holds, and the bound is tight when is divisible by since we have Inspired by this observation we conjecture that every -cube-free subset of has size less than where is divisible by , and we show the tightness of this bound by providing an example . We prove the conjecture for several interesting cases, including when is the smallest prime factor of , or when is a prime power. We also discuss some related issues regarding -free sets and -free sets. A main ingredient we apply is to arrange all the integers into some square matrix, with having the coordinate . Here is a given integer and is not divisible by .
Paper Structure (6 sections, 9 theorems, 62 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 9 theorems, 62 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.3

Let $A$ be a $d$-cube-free subset of $\mathbb{Z}_{N}$ where $d\mid N$. We have when one of following is true: (i)$d=3$. (ii)$d$ is the smallest prime factor of $N$. (iii)$N$ is the power of some prime $p$.

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Conjecture 1: Eberhard--Pohoata
  • Conjecture 2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: Cauchy--Davenport
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.1
  • ...and 8 more