Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Sensitivity of robust optimization problems under drift and volatility uncertainty

Daniel Bartl, Ariel Neufeld, Kyunghyun Park

TL;DR

The paper analyzes robust optimization under drift and volatility uncertainty in continuous-time trading. It establishes a precise first-order sensitivity expansion V(ε) = V(0) + ε V'(0) + O(ε^2) when the uncertainty set is a small ε-neighborhood around baseline parameters, with V'(0) given explicitly via BSDE-derived terms Y^*, Z^*, \\mathcal{Y}^*, \\mathcal{Z}^*. An envelope theorem shows that strategies optimal for the baseline problem perform nearly as well as those optimized for the robust problem, up to second-order terms. The results are illustrated with a robust mean-variance hedging example, and the proofs rely on BSDE representations, GKW decompositions, and stability analyses of the forward-backward system. This provides a practical pathway to approximate robust policies using baseline solutions and explicit sensitivity corrections.

Abstract

We examine optimization problems in which an investor has the opportunity to trade in $d$ stocks with the goal of maximizing her worst-case cost of cumulative gains and losses. Here, worst-case refers to taking into account all possible drift and volatility processes for the stocks that fall within a $\varepsilon$-neighborhood of predefined fixed baseline processes. Although solving the worst-case problem for a fixed $\varepsilon>0$ is known to be very challenging in general, we show that it can be approximated as $\varepsilon\to 0$ by the baseline problem (computed using the baseline processes) in the following sense: Firstly, the value of the worst-case problem is equal to the value of the baseline problem plus $\varepsilon$ times a correction term. This correction term can be computed explicitly and quantifies how sensitive a given optimization problem is to model uncertainty. Moreover, approximately optimal trading strategies for the worst-case problem can be obtained using optimal strategies from the corresponding baseline problem.

Sensitivity of robust optimization problems under drift and volatility uncertainty

TL;DR

The paper analyzes robust optimization under drift and volatility uncertainty in continuous-time trading. It establishes a precise first-order sensitivity expansion V(ε) = V(0) + ε V'(0) + O(ε^2) when the uncertainty set is a small ε-neighborhood around baseline parameters, with V'(0) given explicitly via BSDE-derived terms Y^*, Z^*, \\mathcal{Y}^*, \\mathcal{Z}^*. An envelope theorem shows that strategies optimal for the baseline problem perform nearly as well as those optimized for the robust problem, up to second-order terms. The results are illustrated with a robust mean-variance hedging example, and the proofs rely on BSDE representations, GKW decompositions, and stability analyses of the forward-backward system. This provides a practical pathway to approximate robust policies using baseline solutions and explicit sensitivity corrections.

Abstract

We examine optimization problems in which an investor has the opportunity to trade in stocks with the goal of maximizing her worst-case cost of cumulative gains and losses. Here, worst-case refers to taking into account all possible drift and volatility processes for the stocks that fall within a -neighborhood of predefined fixed baseline processes. Although solving the worst-case problem for a fixed is known to be very challenging in general, we show that it can be approximated as by the baseline problem (computed using the baseline processes) in the following sense: Firstly, the value of the worst-case problem is equal to the value of the baseline problem plus times a correction term. This correction term can be computed explicitly and quantifies how sensitive a given optimization problem is to model uncertainty. Moreover, approximately optimal trading strategies for the worst-case problem can be obtained using optimal strategies from the corresponding baseline problem.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 19 theorems, 198 equations)

This paper contains 13 sections, 19 theorems, 198 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.3

Suppose that $\sigma^o$ is invertible. Then each of the following conditions is sufficient for Assumption as:posterior_refer to hold:

Theorems & Definitions (44)

  • Remark 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Lemma 2.6
  • Remark 2.8
  • Proposition 2.9
  • Remark 2.10
  • Lemma 2.11
  • Corollary 2.12
  • Theorem 2.13
  • ...and 34 more