Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the dimension of limit sets on $\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ via stationary measures: the theory and applications

Jialun Li, Wenyu Pan, Disheng Xu

Abstract

This paper investigates the (semi)group action of $\mathrm{SL}_3(\mathbb{R})$ on $\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{R}^3)$, a primary example of non-conformal, non-linear, and non-strictly contracting action. We study the Hausdorff dimension of a dynamically defined limit set in $\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ and generalize the classical Patterson-Sullivan formula using the approach of stationary measures. The two main examples are Anosov representations in $\mathrm{SL}_3(\mathbb{R})$ and the Rauzy gasket. 1. For Anosov representations in $\mathrm{SL}_3(\mathbb{R})$, we establish a sharp lower bound for the dimension of their limit sets in $\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{R}^3)$. Coupled with the upper bound in Pozzetti-Sambarino-Wienhard, it shows that their Hausdorff dimensions equal the affinity exponents. The merit of our approach is that it works uniformly for all the components of irreducible Anosov representations in $\mathrm{SL}_3(\mathbb{R})$. As an application, it reveals a surprising dimension jump phenomenon in the Barbot component, which is a local generalization of Bowen's dimension rigidity result. 2. For the Rauzy gasket, we confirm a folklore conjecture about the Hausdorff dimension of the gasket and improve the numerical lower bound to $3/2$. These results originate from a dimension formula of stationary measures on $\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{R}^3)$. Let $ν$ be a probability measure on $\mathrm{SL}_3(\mathbb{R})$ whose support is finite and spans a Zariski dense subgroup. Let $μ$ be the associated stationary measure for the action on $\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{R}^3)$. Under the exponential separation condition on $ν$, we prove that the Hausdorff dimension of $μ$ equals its Lyapunov dimension, which extends Hochman-Solomyak and Bárány-Hochman-Rapaport to non-conformal and projective settings respectively.

On the dimension of limit sets on $\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ via stationary measures: the theory and applications

Abstract

This paper investigates the (semi)group action of on , a primary example of non-conformal, non-linear, and non-strictly contracting action. We study the Hausdorff dimension of a dynamically defined limit set in and generalize the classical Patterson-Sullivan formula using the approach of stationary measures. The two main examples are Anosov representations in and the Rauzy gasket. 1. For Anosov representations in , we establish a sharp lower bound for the dimension of their limit sets in . Coupled with the upper bound in Pozzetti-Sambarino-Wienhard, it shows that their Hausdorff dimensions equal the affinity exponents. The merit of our approach is that it works uniformly for all the components of irreducible Anosov representations in . As an application, it reveals a surprising dimension jump phenomenon in the Barbot component, which is a local generalization of Bowen's dimension rigidity result. 2. For the Rauzy gasket, we confirm a folklore conjecture about the Hausdorff dimension of the gasket and improve the numerical lower bound to . These results originate from a dimension formula of stationary measures on . Let be a probability measure on whose support is finite and spans a Zariski dense subgroup. Let be the associated stationary measure for the action on . Under the exponential separation condition on , we prove that the Hausdorff dimension of equals its Lyapunov dimension, which extends Hochman-Solomyak and Bárány-Hochman-Rapaport to non-conformal and projective settings respectively.
Paper Structure (65 sections, 94 theorems, 451 equations, 5 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 65 sections, 94 theorems, 451 equations, 5 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Let $\Gamma$ be a hyperbolic group and $\rho:\Gamma\rightarrow\rm{SL}_3(\mathbb{R})$ be an irreducible Anosov representation, then the Hausdorff dimension of the limit set $L(\rho(\Gamma))$ in $\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ equals the affinity exponent $s_{\mathrm{A}}(\rho)$. Moreover, the exponent $s_{

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Figure in arnoux_rauzy_2013
  • Figure 2: $\pi_{{E_1}^\perp}\ell = h \circ \pi_{\ell^{-1}E_1,E_1^{\perp}}$
  • Figure 3: The $[\ell]$-attracting region
  • Figure 4: Case 1
  • Figure 5: Case 2

Theorems & Definitions (199)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Corollary 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Theorem 1.8
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • ...and 189 more