Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Lagrangian subvarieties of hyperspherical varieties

Michael Finkelberg, Victor Ginzburg, Roman Travkin

TL;DR

The article develops and tests conjectures about Lagrangian subvarieties Λ_X arising from hyperspherical G-varieties and a dual correspondence with Λ_{X^∨}, tying geometric, algebraic, and combinatorial data through moment maps and flag-variety geometry. It recasts the problem in terms of coisotropic-to-Lagrangian fiber criteria, proposes a Koszul-type duality between appropriate B-equivariant and B^∨-monodromic categories, and leverages loop-rotation localization for a graded perspective. The bulk of the work verifies these ideas for key families: the F4 example, GL(N|M) (with rooks/mazes indexing), and orthosymplectic cases, where the irreducible Lagrangian components are counted by combinatorial models of non-attacking rooks and centrally symmetric mazes. The results provide a concrete, checkable bridge between geometric representation theory, orbit combinatorics, and dualities, with potential implications for Weyl-group representations and microlocal/Kazhdan-Lusztig-type decompositions in these settings.

Abstract

Given a hyperspherical $G$-variety $\mathscr X$ we consider the zero moment level $Λ_{\mathscr X}\subset{\mathscr X}$ of the action of a Borel subgroup $B\subset G$. We conjecture that $Λ_{\mathscr X}$ is Lagrangian. For the dual $G^\vee$-variety ${\mathscr X}^\vee$, we conjecture that that there is a bijection between the sets of irreducible components $\mathrm{Irr}Λ_{\mathscr X}$ and $\mathrm{Irr}Λ_{{\mathscr X}^\vee}$. We check this conjecture for all the hyperspherical equivariant slices, and for all the basic classical Lie superalgebras.

Lagrangian subvarieties of hyperspherical varieties

TL;DR

The article develops and tests conjectures about Lagrangian subvarieties Λ_X arising from hyperspherical G-varieties and a dual correspondence with Λ_{X^∨}, tying geometric, algebraic, and combinatorial data through moment maps and flag-variety geometry. It recasts the problem in terms of coisotropic-to-Lagrangian fiber criteria, proposes a Koszul-type duality between appropriate B-equivariant and B^∨-monodromic categories, and leverages loop-rotation localization for a graded perspective. The bulk of the work verifies these ideas for key families: the F4 example, GL(N|M) (with rooks/mazes indexing), and orthosymplectic cases, where the irreducible Lagrangian components are counted by combinatorial models of non-attacking rooks and centrally symmetric mazes. The results provide a concrete, checkable bridge between geometric representation theory, orbit combinatorics, and dualities, with potential implications for Weyl-group representations and microlocal/Kazhdan-Lusztig-type decompositions in these settings.

Abstract

Given a hyperspherical -variety we consider the zero moment level of the action of a Borel subgroup . We conjecture that is Lagrangian. For the dual -variety , we conjecture that that there is a bijection between the sets of irreducible components and . We check this conjecture for all the hyperspherical equivariant slices, and for all the basic classical Lie superalgebras.
Paper Structure (27 sections, 20 theorems, 6 equations, 2 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 27 sections, 20 theorems, 6 equations, 2 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1.1

Let ${\mathscr X}$ be a smooth affine Hamiltonian $G$-variety, and $Z\subset{\boldsymbol{\mu}}({\mathscr X})$ a locally closed $G$-stable subset. Let $\bar{\lambda}\in{\mathfrak{b}}^*$ be a character of ${\mathfrak{b}}$, so that its preimage in ${\mathfrak{g}}^*$ is $\bar{\lambda}+{\mathfrak{b}}^\pe (2) The variety ${\mathscr X}$ is coisotropic if and only if the equivalent conditions in (1) hold

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: A $9\times10$-maze
  • Figure 2: ${\mathfrak{M}}_{4,4}^\iota\mathbin{\newline{\overset{\sim}{\newline{\longrightarrow}}}}{\mathfrak{M}}_{4,5}^\iota$

Theorems & Definitions (43)

  • Conjecture 1.1.1
  • Conjecture 1.1.2
  • Conjecture 1.1.3
  • Remark 1.1.4
  • Proposition 2.1.1
  • proof
  • Remark 2.1.2
  • Proposition 3.1.1
  • Lemma 3.3.1
  • proof
  • ...and 33 more