Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Linear magneto-conductivity as a DC probe of time-reversal symmetry breaking

Veronika Sunko, Chunxiao Liu, Marc Vila, Ilyoun Na, Yuchen Tang, Vladyslav Kozii, Sinéad M. Griffin, Joel E. Moore, Joseph Orenstein

Abstract

Several optical experiments have shown that in magnetic materials the principal axes of response tensors can rotate in a magnetic field. Here we offer a microscopic explanation of this effect, and propose a closely related DC transport phenomenon -- an off-diagonal \emph{symmetric} conductivity linear in a magnetic field, which we refer to as linear magneto-conductivity (LMC). Although LMC has the same functional dependence on magnetic field as the Hall effect, its origin is fundamentally different: LMC requires time-reversal symmetry to be broken even before a magnetic field is applied, and is therefore a sensitive probe of magnetism. We demonstrate LMC in three different ways: via a tight-binding toy model, density functional theory calculations on MnPSe$_3$, and a semiclassical calculation. The third approach additionally identifies two distinct mechanisms yielding LMC: momentum-dependent band magnetization and Berry curvature. Finally, we propose an experimental geometry suitable for detecting LMC, and demonstrate its applicability using Landauer-Büttiker simulations. Our results emphasize the importance of measuring the full conductivity tensor in magnetic materials, and introduce LMC as a new transport probe of symmetry.

Linear magneto-conductivity as a DC probe of time-reversal symmetry breaking

Abstract

Several optical experiments have shown that in magnetic materials the principal axes of response tensors can rotate in a magnetic field. Here we offer a microscopic explanation of this effect, and propose a closely related DC transport phenomenon -- an off-diagonal \emph{symmetric} conductivity linear in a magnetic field, which we refer to as linear magneto-conductivity (LMC). Although LMC has the same functional dependence on magnetic field as the Hall effect, its origin is fundamentally different: LMC requires time-reversal symmetry to be broken even before a magnetic field is applied, and is therefore a sensitive probe of magnetism. We demonstrate LMC in three different ways: via a tight-binding toy model, density functional theory calculations on MnPSe, and a semiclassical calculation. The third approach additionally identifies two distinct mechanisms yielding LMC: momentum-dependent band magnetization and Berry curvature. Finally, we propose an experimental geometry suitable for detecting LMC, and demonstrate its applicability using Landauer-Büttiker simulations. Our results emphasize the importance of measuring the full conductivity tensor in magnetic materials, and introduce LMC as a new transport probe of symmetry.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 37 equations, 7 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 8 sections, 37 equations, 7 figures, 1 table.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: (a) The model considers a one electron $f\rightarrow d$ transition, with a degenerate initial state manifold and a final state manifold split by the three terms in Eq. \ref{['eq:Hamiltonian']}: $\Delta_{CF}$ separates the $d$ manifold into states of $e_g$ and $t_{2g}$ symmetry. (b) The ratio of off-diagonal symmetric conductivity to the average diagonal conductivity as a function of $H_z/H_y$, calculated for the different final states in Fig. \ref{['fig:Model']}a. (c) The orbital wave functions corresponding to $\left<L_{\alpha}^{\text{eff}}\right>=1$, for $\alpha=y, z, (z+y)/\sqrt{2}$.
  • Figure 2: Rotation of Fermi surfaces and change of conductivity in a tight binding model as a function of magnetization. (a) Top view of the triangular lattice of magnetic ions with moment ${\bf M}=(0,M_y,M_z)$ in the $y-z$ plane. The panels (b-d) study quantities when ${\bf M}$ points along $-45^\circ$, $0^\circ$, or $+45^\circ$ from the $y$ axis, represented by red, grey, and blue arrows. (b) The band dispersion along high symmetry path in the Brillouin zone (BZ) for the three orientations of ${\bf M}$. $t$ is the overall hopping energy scale and $E_F$ is the Fermi energy. (c) FS at the Fermi energy $E = E_F$ for the three orientations of ${\bf M}$. As ${\bf M}$ is oriented from $-45^\circ$ to $+45^\circ$, the FS rotates accordingly in a clockwise way. (d) The conductivity angle $2\sigma^s_{xy}/(\sigma_{xx}+\sigma_{yy})$ as a function of $M_z/M_y$. For (c) and (d) we assumed the filling at $E=E_F$.
  • Figure 3: (a) L-shape device geometry. The scattering region (leads) is denoted by the black (red) lattice. Leads 1 and 10 are the source and drain electrodes, while leads 2-8 are voltage probes. (b) Conductivity angle for the symmetric (red) and Hall (green) conductivity as a function of $M_z/M_y$. The calculations are done based on the tight binding model (Eq. \ref{['eq:TBHam']}, Fig. \ref{['fig:TightBinding']}), with a Fermi level of $-1.95$. Solid line is the average value performed over 5 disorder realizations (shown in dashed, paler color).
  • Figure 4: (a) Top view and side view of the MnPSe$_3$ crystal structure. The red and blue arrows indicate the two magnetization directions used in the calculations. (b) Conductivity angle as a function of energy for magnetization orientation along $\pm45\degree$ with respect to the $z$ axis in the $yz$ plane.
  • Figure S1: Longitudinal conductivity extracted from the two-terminal conductance for two strengths of Anderson disorder and for a device oriented along $x$ (black) and along $y$ (red). 10 disorder averages have been carrid out. The diffusive regime exists for lengths in which the conductivity remains constant. The vertical dashed (dotted) line denotes the chosen inter-lead distance (total length) of the L-shaped device. Importantly, lengths within these two vertical lines fall within diffusive transport.
  • ...and 2 more figures