Table of Contents
Fetching ...

PFA and the definability of the nonstationary ideal

Stefan Hoffelner, Paul Larson, Ralf Schindler, Liuzhen Wu

TL;DR

The paper addresses whether the nonstationary ideal on $\omega_1$ can be made $\Pi_1$-definable in a model of ${\sf PFA}$. It introduces a coding/certification framework built on a two-phase forcing: add a partition of $\omega_1$ via ${\rm Col}(\omega_1,\omega_1)$ and run a countable-support iteration interleaving certification forcings with the ${\sf PFA}$ iteration, guided by a supercompact Laver function. This yields a model $V[g]$ in which ${\sf PFA}$ holds, ${\sf NS}_{\omega_1}$ is $\Pi_1$-definable relative to a parameter from $H_{\aleph_2}$, and ${\sf CFB}$ fails (with ${\sf NS}_{\omega_1}$ not saturated). The construction demonstrates a robust method to code ideals via certification that is absolute to stationary-set-preserving extensions, with potential applicability to other ideals. The results have implications for the definability strength of the NS-ideal under strong forcing axioms.

Abstract

We produce, relative to a ${\sf ZFC}$ model with a supercompact cardinal, a ${\sf ZFC}$ model of the Proper Forcing Axiom in which the nonstationary ideal on $ω_1$ is $Π_1$-definable in a parameter from $H_{\aleph_2}$.

PFA and the definability of the nonstationary ideal

TL;DR

The paper addresses whether the nonstationary ideal on can be made -definable in a model of . It introduces a coding/certification framework built on a two-phase forcing: add a partition of via and run a countable-support iteration interleaving certification forcings with the iteration, guided by a supercompact Laver function. This yields a model in which holds, is -definable relative to a parameter from , and fails (with not saturated). The construction demonstrates a robust method to code ideals via certification that is absolute to stationary-set-preserving extensions, with potential applicability to other ideals. The results have implications for the definability strength of the NS-ideal under strong forcing axioms.

Abstract

We produce, relative to a model with a supercompact cardinal, a model of the Proper Forcing Axiom in which the nonstationary ideal on is -definable in a parameter from .
Paper Structure (3 sections, 8 theorems, 6 equations)

This paper contains 3 sections, 8 theorems, 6 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

If there exists a supercompact cardinal, then there exists a proper forcing extension in which ${\sf PFA}$ holds and ${\sf NS}_{\omega_{1}}$ is $\Pi_{1}$-definable in a parameter from $H_{\aleph_{2}}$.

Theorems & Definitions (15)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • Definition 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • ...and 5 more