Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On multi-graded Proj schemes

Arnaud Mayeux, Simon Riche

TL;DR

The paper develops a comprehensive framework for Proj schemes graded by a finitely generated abelian group $M$, extending Grothendieck's Proj and recasting it through the Brenner--Schröer construction via a diagonalizable group action and the central notion of potions. It establishes the glueing mechanism (the magic of potions) for ${\rm Proj}^M(A)$, studies open subschemes defined by quasi-relevant elements, and extends Serre-type results to quasi-coherent sheaves in this multi-graded context, including twisting and derived-category equivalences. The framework is then applied to canonical geometric objects in Geometric Representation Theory: flag varieties, vector bundles over them, and the Springer resolution are realized as Proj schemes of natural multigraded rings, yielding canonical, choice-free constructions. The work also links Proj theory with dilatations and multi-centered blowups, providing a robust algebraic toolkit for relative Proj, base change, and geometric quotients, with broad implications for representation-theoretic geometry and beyond.

Abstract

We review the construction (due to Brenner--Schröer) of the Proj scheme associated with a ring graded by a finitely generated abelian group. This construction generalizes the well-known Grothendieck Proj construction for $\mathbb{N}$-graded rings; we extend some classical results (in particular, regarding quasi-coherent sheaves on such schemes) from the $\mathbb{N}$-graded setting to this general setting, and prove new results that make sense only in the general setting of Brenner--Schröer. Finally, we show that flag varieties of reductive groups, as well as some vector bundles over such varieties attached to representations of a Borel subgroup, can be naturally interpreted in this formalism.

On multi-graded Proj schemes

TL;DR

The paper develops a comprehensive framework for Proj schemes graded by a finitely generated abelian group , extending Grothendieck's Proj and recasting it through the Brenner--Schröer construction via a diagonalizable group action and the central notion of potions. It establishes the glueing mechanism (the magic of potions) for , studies open subschemes defined by quasi-relevant elements, and extends Serre-type results to quasi-coherent sheaves in this multi-graded context, including twisting and derived-category equivalences. The framework is then applied to canonical geometric objects in Geometric Representation Theory: flag varieties, vector bundles over them, and the Springer resolution are realized as Proj schemes of natural multigraded rings, yielding canonical, choice-free constructions. The work also links Proj theory with dilatations and multi-centered blowups, providing a robust algebraic toolkit for relative Proj, base change, and geometric quotients, with broad implications for representation-theoretic geometry and beyond.

Abstract

We review the construction (due to Brenner--Schröer) of the Proj scheme associated with a ring graded by a finitely generated abelian group. This construction generalizes the well-known Grothendieck Proj construction for -graded rings; we extend some classical results (in particular, regarding quasi-coherent sheaves on such schemes) from the -graded setting to this general setting, and prove new results that make sense only in the general setting of Brenner--Schröer. Finally, we show that flag varieties of reductive groups, as well as some vector bundles over such varieties attached to representations of a Borel subgroup, can be naturally interpreted in this formalism.
Paper Structure (30 sections, 44 theorems, 161 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 30 sections, 44 theorems, 161 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Proposition 2.5

Let $S$ be a homogeneous multiplicative subset of $A$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Some constructions in algebraic geometry associated with gradings

Theorems & Definitions (134)

  • Remark 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Definition 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • ...and 124 more