Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The damped focusing cubic wave equation on a bounded domain

Thomas Perrin

Abstract

For the focusing cubic wave equation on a compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $3$, the dichotomy between global existence and blow-up for solutions starting below the energy of the ground state is known since the work of Payne and Sattinger. In the case of a damped equation, we prove that the dichotomy between global existence and blow-up still holds. In particular, the damping does not prevent blow-up. Assuming that the damping satisfies the geometric control condition, we then prove that any global solution converges to a stationary solution along a time sequence, and that global solutions below the energy of the ground state can be stabilised, adapting the proof of a similar result in the defocusing case.

The damped focusing cubic wave equation on a bounded domain

Abstract

For the focusing cubic wave equation on a compact Riemannian manifold of dimension , the dichotomy between global existence and blow-up for solutions starting below the energy of the ground state is known since the work of Payne and Sattinger. In the case of a damped equation, we prove that the dichotomy between global existence and blow-up still holds. In particular, the damping does not prevent blow-up. Assuming that the damping satisfies the geometric control condition, we then prove that any global solution converges to a stationary solution along a time sequence, and that global solutions below the energy of the ground state can be stabilised, adapting the proof of a similar result in the defocusing case.
Paper Structure (24 sections, 23 theorems, 200 equations)

This paper contains 24 sections, 23 theorems, 200 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

The spaces $\mathscr{K}^+$ and $\mathscr{K}^-$ are stable under the flow of (KG_nL). A solution starting from $\mathscr{K}^+$ is defined on $\mathbb{R}$, and a solution starting from $\mathscr{K}^-$ blows up in finite positive and negative times.

Theorems & Definitions (39)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Definition 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • Remark 6
  • Remark 7
  • Theorem 8
  • Remark 9
  • Theorem 10: Strichartz estimates
  • ...and 29 more