Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Total variation regularization for recovering the spatial source term in a time-fractional diffusion equation

Bin Fan

TL;DR

This work tackles the inverse problem of recovering a space-dependent source in a time-fractional diffusion equation with partial interior data. It replaces traditional $L^2$ penalties with a total variation regularization within a variational optimal control framework, providing existence and stability results for the continuous problem and convergence of a fully discrete scheme based on finite elements in space and a L1-time discretization. A linearized primal-dual algorithm is developed to solve the resulting saddle-point formulation efficiently, with rigorous guidance on step sizes and convergence. Numerical experiments in 1D and 2D demonstrate that TV regularization produces sharp, non-smoothing reconstructions of discontinuous sources and offers robustness to noise, outperforming classical Tikhonov approaches in preserving edges and support.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider an inverse space-dependent source problem for a time-fractional diffusion equation. To deal with the ill-posedness of the problem, we transform the problem into an optimal control problem with total variational (TV) regularization. In contrast to the classical Tikhonov model incorporating $L^2$ penalty terms, the inclusion of a TV term proves advantageous in reconstructing solutions that exhibit discontinuities or piecewise constancy. The control problem is approximated by a fully discrete scheme, and convergence results are provided within this framework. Furthermore, a lineraed primal-dual iterative algorithm is proposed to solve the discrete control model based on an equivalent saddle-point reformulation, and several numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the algorithm.

Total variation regularization for recovering the spatial source term in a time-fractional diffusion equation

TL;DR

This work tackles the inverse problem of recovering a space-dependent source in a time-fractional diffusion equation with partial interior data. It replaces traditional penalties with a total variation regularization within a variational optimal control framework, providing existence and stability results for the continuous problem and convergence of a fully discrete scheme based on finite elements in space and a L1-time discretization. A linearized primal-dual algorithm is developed to solve the resulting saddle-point formulation efficiently, with rigorous guidance on step sizes and convergence. Numerical experiments in 1D and 2D demonstrate that TV regularization produces sharp, non-smoothing reconstructions of discontinuous sources and offers robustness to noise, outperforming classical Tikhonov approaches in preserving edges and support.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider an inverse space-dependent source problem for a time-fractional diffusion equation. To deal with the ill-posedness of the problem, we transform the problem into an optimal control problem with total variational (TV) regularization. In contrast to the classical Tikhonov model incorporating penalty terms, the inclusion of a TV term proves advantageous in reconstructing solutions that exhibit discontinuities or piecewise constancy. The control problem is approximated by a fully discrete scheme, and convergence results are provided within this framework. Furthermore, a lineraed primal-dual iterative algorithm is proposed to solve the discrete control model based on an equivalent saddle-point reformulation, and several numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the algorithm.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 13 theorems, 94 equations, 6 figures, 2 tables, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 9 sections, 13 theorems, 94 equations, 6 figures, 2 tables, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

$($jiang2017weak and jiang2020numerical$)$ Let $f\in L^2(\Omega)$ and $\mu\in L^\infty(0,T)$. Then the initial-boundary value problem prob-forward admits a unique solution $u(f)\in _0\!H^\alpha (0,T;L^2(\Omega))\cap C([0,T];L^2(\Omega))\cap L^2(0,T;H^2(\Omega))$ such that where constant $c>0$ depending on $\Omega$, $T$, $\alpha$ and $\mu$.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 6.1: The computed source functions for Example \ref{['examp-1']} with $\alpha=0.3$, $\mu(t)=\cos(2\pi t)$ and $\omega=[2/50,25/50]$. $(a)$: $\delta_{\mathrm{rel}}=1\%$; $(b)$: $\delta_{\mathrm{rel}}=0.1\%$; $(c)$: the absolute error $|f^n-f^*|$.
  • Figure 6.2: The computed source functions for Example \ref{['examp-1']} with $\alpha=0.8$, $\mu(t)\equiv 1$ and $\omega=[28/50,48/50]$. $(a)$: $\delta_{\mathrm{rel}}=5\%$; $(b)$: $\delta_{\mathrm{rel}}=0.5\%$; $(c)$: the absolute error $|f^n-f^*|$.
  • Figure 6.3: Approximate solution of equation \ref{['prob-forward']} with $\alpha=0.8$ and $\mu(t)=\cos(2\pi t)$(first row)/ $\mu(t)\equiv 1$(second row). The observation regions are located between the black dashed lines, i.e., $\omega=[2/50,25/50]$. The relative noise level $\delta_{\mathrm{rel}}=0.1\%$. $(a)$ and $(d)$: finite element solution $u(f^*)(x,t)$; $(b)$ and $(e)$: approximation solution $u(f^n)(x,t)$; $(c)$ and $(f)$: the absolute error $|u(f^n)(x,t)-u(f^*)(x,t)|$.
  • Figure 6.4: The computed source functions for Example \ref{['examp-1']} with $\alpha=0.5$, $\mu(t)=\sin(5\pi t)$, $\omega=[15/50,35/50]$ and $\delta_{\mathrm{rel}}=0.5\%$. $(a)$: Tikhonov solution; $(b)$: TV solution; $(c)$: the absolute error $|f^n-f^*|$.
  • Figure 6.5: Approximate solution of equation \ref{['prob-forward']} with $\alpha=0.5$ and $\mu(t)=\sin(5\pi t)$. The observation regions are located between the black dashed lines, i.e., $\omega=[15/50,35/50]$. The relative noise level $\delta_{\mathrm{rel}}=0.1\%$. $(a)$: finite element solution $u(f^*)(x,t)$; $(b)$: Tikhonov solution $u(f^n)(x,t)$$(c)$: the absolute error of Tikhonov solution; $(d)$: TV solution; $(c)$: the absolute error of TV solution.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (19)

  • Lemma 2.1
  • Definition 2.1
  • Proposition 3.1
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Theorem 3.2
  • Lemma 4.1
  • Theorem 4.1
  • Theorem 4.2
  • Lemma 4.2
  • Lemma 4.3
  • ...and 9 more