Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Reuniting $χ$-boundedness with polynomial $χ$-boundedness

Maria Chudnovsky, Linda Cook, James Davies, Sang-il Oum

TL;DR

This work investigates the boundary between χ-boundedness and polynomial χ-boundedness by introducing Pollyanna classes: graph classes C such that C ∩ F is polynomially χ-bounded for every χ-bounded class F. It proves that several natural hereditary classes are Pollyanna with explicit n-strong bounds, including mK_t-free, (t,k)-pineapple-free, t-lollipop-free, bowtie-free, and bull-free graphs, by leveraging structural decompositions, substitutions, and trigraph techniques. It also establishes non-Pollyanna phenomena: for certain finite families not containing any willow, the F-free graphs fail to be Pollyanna, highlighting the sharp contrast between global and local χ-boundedness and revealing the central role of willows in this theory. The results provide a unified framework connecting χ-boundedness, polynomial bounds, and graph decompositions, with implications for understanding Erdős–Hajnal-type phenomena and related coloring questions in restricted graph classes.

Abstract

A class $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs is $χ$-bounded if there is a function $f$ such that $χ(H)\le f(ω(H))$ for all induced subgraphs $H$ of a graph in $\mathcal{F}$. If $f$ can be chosen to be a polynomial, we say that $\mathcal{F}$ is polynomially $χ$-bounded. Esperet proposed a conjecture that every $χ$-bounded class of graphs is polynomially $χ$-bounded. This conjecture has been disproved; it has been shown that there are classes of graphs that are $χ$-bounded but not polynomially $χ$-bounded. Nevertheless, inspired by Esperet's conjecture, we introduce Pollyanna classes of graphs. A class $\mathcal{C}$ of graphs is Pollyanna if $\mathcal{C}\cap \mathcal{F}$ is polynomially $χ$-bounded for every $χ$-bounded class $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs. We prove that several classes of graphs are Pollyanna and also present some proper classes of graphs that are not Pollyanna.

Reuniting $χ$-boundedness with polynomial $χ$-boundedness

TL;DR

This work investigates the boundary between χ-boundedness and polynomial χ-boundedness by introducing Pollyanna classes: graph classes C such that C ∩ F is polynomially χ-bounded for every χ-bounded class F. It proves that several natural hereditary classes are Pollyanna with explicit n-strong bounds, including mK_t-free, (t,k)-pineapple-free, t-lollipop-free, bowtie-free, and bull-free graphs, by leveraging structural decompositions, substitutions, and trigraph techniques. It also establishes non-Pollyanna phenomena: for certain finite families not containing any willow, the F-free graphs fail to be Pollyanna, highlighting the sharp contrast between global and local χ-boundedness and revealing the central role of willows in this theory. The results provide a unified framework connecting χ-boundedness, polynomial bounds, and graph decompositions, with implications for understanding Erdős–Hajnal-type phenomena and related coloring questions in restricted graph classes.

Abstract

A class of graphs is -bounded if there is a function such that for all induced subgraphs of a graph in . If can be chosen to be a polynomial, we say that is polynomially -bounded. Esperet proposed a conjecture that every -bounded class of graphs is polynomially -bounded. This conjecture has been disproved; it has been shown that there are classes of graphs that are -bounded but not polynomially -bounded. Nevertheless, inspired by Esperet's conjecture, we introduce Pollyanna classes of graphs. A class of graphs is Pollyanna if is polynomially -bounded for every -bounded class of graphs. We prove that several classes of graphs are Pollyanna and also present some proper classes of graphs that are not Pollyanna.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 60 theorems, 9 equations, 12 figures)

This paper contains 13 sections, 60 theorems, 9 equations, 12 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $m$, $k$, $t$ be positive integers. The following graph classes are all Pollyanna.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Forbidding any of these graphs makes a Pollyanna class of graphs.
  • Figure 2: A pentagram spider, a tall strider, and a short strider are graphs obtained from the above figure by adding any additional edges between two red hollow vertices.
  • Figure 3: Graphs $\overline{P_9}$, $\overline{C_7}$, $F_7$, and $W_7$. The class of ($\overline{P_9}$, $\overline{C_7}$, $F_7$, $W_7$)-free graphs is not Pollyanna.
  • Figure 4: An illustration for the proof of \ref{['prop:pineapple']}.
  • Figure 5: A homogeneous pair.
  • ...and 7 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (125)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 2.1: Chudnovsky, Penev, Scott, and Trotignon CPST2013
  • Theorem 2.2: Seinsche Seinsche1974
  • Theorem 2.3: Chvátal and Sbihi chvatal1987bull
  • Lemma 2.4: Lovász Lovasz1972
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.2
  • ...and 115 more