Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Noise-Robust One-Bit Diffraction Tomography and Optimal Dose Fractionation

Pengwen Chen, Albert Fannjiang

TL;DR

This work develops a noise-robust framework for 1-bit diffraction tomography using coded apertures, blending random-matrix theory with forward-scattering modeling and iterative reconstruction methods. By formulating the problem as a 3D phase retrieval task and employing power and shifted inverse power iterations, the authors analyze how Poisson noise (NSR) and dose distribution affect reconstruction quality. A key finding is that optimal dose fractionation occurs at NSR ≈ 1, independent of total dose, implying many low-dose views maximize information gain in 1-bit measurements. The study also demonstrates that 2-phase and 4-phase random masks can match continuous-phase performance, and discusses practical considerations for dose economy and future extensions to adaptive thresholds and hybrid measurement models.

Abstract

This study presents a noise-robust framework for 1-bit diffraction tomography, a novel imaging approach that relies on intensity-only binary measurements obtained through coded apertures. The proposed reconstruction scheme leverages random matrix theory and iterative algorithms to effectively recover 3D object structures under high-noise conditions. A key contribution is the numerical investigation of dose fractionation, revealing optimal performance at a signal-to-noise ratio near 1, {\em independent of the total dose}. This finding addresses the question: How to distribute a given level of total radiation energy among different tomographic views in order to optimize the quality of reconstruction?

Noise-Robust One-Bit Diffraction Tomography and Optimal Dose Fractionation

TL;DR

This work develops a noise-robust framework for 1-bit diffraction tomography using coded apertures, blending random-matrix theory with forward-scattering modeling and iterative reconstruction methods. By formulating the problem as a 3D phase retrieval task and employing power and shifted inverse power iterations, the authors analyze how Poisson noise (NSR) and dose distribution affect reconstruction quality. A key finding is that optimal dose fractionation occurs at NSR ≈ 1, independent of total dose, implying many low-dose views maximize information gain in 1-bit measurements. The study also demonstrates that 2-phase and 4-phase random masks can match continuous-phase performance, and discusses practical considerations for dose economy and future extensions to adaptive thresholds and hybrid measurement models.

Abstract

This study presents a noise-robust framework for 1-bit diffraction tomography, a novel imaging approach that relies on intensity-only binary measurements obtained through coded apertures. The proposed reconstruction scheme leverages random matrix theory and iterative algorithms to effectively recover 3D object structures under high-noise conditions. A key contribution is the numerical investigation of dose fractionation, revealing optimal performance at a signal-to-noise ratio near 1, {\em independent of the total dose}. This finding addresses the question: How to distribute a given level of total radiation energy among different tomographic views in order to optimize the quality of reconstruction?
Paper Structure (20 sections, 2 theorems, 85 equations, 9 figures, 2 algorithms)

This paper contains 20 sections, 2 theorems, 85 equations, 9 figures, 2 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

null Let ${\mathcal{A}}$ be an $M\times N$ i.i.d. complex Gaussian matrix and $f_{\min}$ a minimizer of nul3. Suppose Then with an overwhelming probability, the relative error bound holds for some constant $c_0$, where $\|\cdot\|_{\rm F}$ denotes the Frobenius norm. Here and below, the over-line notation denotes the complex conjugation.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Coded aperture diffraction tomography: Diffraction patterns of an object in various orientations are measured with the same random mask (see Section \ref{['sec:forward']})
  • Figure 2: $216\times 216$ image $\Longrightarrow$$36\times 36\times 36$ object.
  • Figure 3: Correlation versus computation time (in second) with 5 independent trials with the power method (dashed line) and the inverse power method (solid line). The number of diffraction patterns is $m=3\rho n$.
  • Figure 4: (a) The two leading eigenvalues and (b) the correlations as function of $\rho$ at NSR =1 where $R_1$ and $R_2$ are respective correlations of the two leading eigenvectors with the original object. The number of diffraction patterns is $m=3\rho n$.
  • Figure 5: The correlation of the RPP reconstruction with $3n$ diffraction patterns vs NSR $\in (0,1)$ and the flattened magnitude $|f|$ with (bottom) and without (top) a beam stop. The beam stop covers the $1\%$ center area of each diffraction pattern. Different direction sets ${\mathcal{T}}$ are independently selected for different NSRs.
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (4)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Remark 2.1
  • Proposition E.1
  • proof