Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Physical Theory of Two-stage Thermalization

Cheryne Jonay, Tianci Zhou

Abstract

One indication of thermalization time is subsystem entanglement reaching thermal values. Recent studies on local quantum circuits reveal two exponential stages with decay rates $r_1$ and $r_2$ of the purity before and after thermalization. We provide an entanglement membrane theory interpretation, with $r_1$ corresponding to the domain wall free energy. Circuit geometry can lead to $r_1 < r_2$, producing a ``phantom eigenvalue". Competition between the domain wall and magnon leads to $r_2 < r_1$ when the magnon prevails. However, when the domain wall wins, this mechanism provides a practical approach for measuring entanglement growth through local correlation functions.

A Physical Theory of Two-stage Thermalization

Abstract

One indication of thermalization time is subsystem entanglement reaching thermal values. Recent studies on local quantum circuits reveal two exponential stages with decay rates and of the purity before and after thermalization. We provide an entanglement membrane theory interpretation, with corresponding to the domain wall free energy. Circuit geometry can lead to , producing a ``phantom eigenvalue". Competition between the domain wall and magnon leads to when the magnon prevails. However, when the domain wall wins, this mechanism provides a practical approach for measuring entanglement growth through local correlation functions.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 50 equations, 8 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 11 sections, 50 equations, 8 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Two-stage thermalization. (a): Schematics of 2-stage decay for staircase and brickwall geometry. Both insets show circuits of 4 time steps. Generally $r_1 < r_2$ for staircase geometry and $r_1 \ge r_2$ for brickwork geometry. (b) For the dual unitary $(1,1,a_z)$ circuits, $r_2$ depends on $a_z$ and the boundary condition (periodic or open).
  • Figure 2: Domain wall configurations in brickwall ((a)(b)) and staircase ((c)(d)) geometries. (a) $t< t_{\rm sat}$, spin states at the lattice level (top) and domain wall random walk at the coarsed grained level (bottom). (b) $t> t_{\rm sat}$ for brickwall. (c) $t< t_{\rm sat}$, domain wall has shorter paths in the staircase. (d) Same as (b) for staircase.
  • Figure 3: Magnon partition function and magnon decay rate. (a) heatmap of $Z_{\rm mag}(x, t) / \text{max}_x |Z_{\rm mag}(x, t)|$. The magnon mostly travels on the light cone. (b) Magnon decay rate for clean dual unitary circuits $(1,1,0.7)$, $(1,1,0.6)$ and clean non-dual unitary Floquet circuit $(0.9,0.8,0.5)$.
  • Figure 4: Domain wall and magnon in staircase geometry. (a) The time spans of each parts for $t < t_{\rm sat}$. If the (red) domain wall (anti)-slope is $v$, then $t_2 = \frac{t}{1+v}$. For dual unitary circuit, (b) domain wall favors to have $v = 1$, reducing its rate to be $\frac{\mathcal{E}(0)}{2}$; (c) magnon propagates on the light cone, also reducing its rate to $\frac{1}{2}$ of its value computed from the brickwall geometry.
  • Figure 5: $Z_{\rm mag}(x,t)$ for averaged dual unitary dynamics $(1,1,a_z)$, starting with a magnon mode $\ket{-+ \cdots +}$ from the top boundary. As $a_z$ increases, we observe the ballistic magnon mode becoming increasingly dominant in the dynamics, consistent with the symmetric unitarity $u_{sym}$ approaching a SWAP gate in the limit of $(1,1,1)$. For $(1,1,a_z \sim 0.2)$, the $b_-$ and $b_+$ moves have nearly equal magnitude but opposite signs, resulting in both a positive (red) and negative (blue) ballistic magnon.
  • ...and 3 more figures