Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Full-scale modal testing of a Hawk T1A aircraft for benchmarking vibration-based methods

Marcus Haywood-Alexander, Robin S. Mills, Max D. Champneys, Matthew R. Jones, Matthew S. Bonney, David Wagg, Timothy J. Rogers

TL;DR

This work delivers a new, open-access full-scale Hawk T1A benchmark dataset for vibration-based structural dynamics, including two testing phases (frequency and time domain) and simulated damage scenarios. It provides baseline analyses using frequency-domain Rational Fraction Polynomials and time-domain Covariance-driven SSI for system identification, plus supervised (GMM) and unsupervised (Mahalanobis) SHM approaches. The dataset design emphasizes reproducibility and challenge, supporting virtual sensing, load estimation, and digital-twin applications while highlighting limitations of baseline methods. The open hd5 dataset, detailed experiment setup, and baseline results aim to accelerate development and robust comparison of advanced identification and SHM techniques on realistic, large-scale structures.

Abstract

Research developments for structural dynamics in the fields of design, system identification and structural health monitoring (SHM) have dramatically expanded the bounds of what can be learned from measured vibration data. However, significant challenges remain in the tasks of identification, prediction and evaluation of full-scale structures. A significant aid in the roadmap to the application of cutting-edge methods to the demands of in-service engineering structures, is the development of comprehensive benchmark datasets. With the aim of developing a useful and worthwhile benchmark dataset for structural dynamics, an extensive testing campaign is presented here. This recent campaign was performed on a decommissioned BAE system Hawk T1A aircraft at the Laboratory for Verification and Validation (LVV) in Sheffield. The aim of this paper is to present the dataset, providing details on the structure, experimental design, and data acquired. The collected data is made freely and openly available with the intention that it serve as a benchmark dataset for challenges in full-scale structural dynamics. Here, the details pertaining to two test phases (frequency and time domain) are presented. So as to ensure that the presented dataset is able to function as a benchmark, some baseline-level results are additionally presented for the tasks of identification and prediction, using standard approaches. It is envisaged that advanced methodologies will demonstrate superiority by favourable comparison with the results presented here. Finally, some dataset-specific challenges are described, with a view to form a hierarchy of tasks and frame discussion over their relative difficulty.

Full-scale modal testing of a Hawk T1A aircraft for benchmarking vibration-based methods

TL;DR

This work delivers a new, open-access full-scale Hawk T1A benchmark dataset for vibration-based structural dynamics, including two testing phases (frequency and time domain) and simulated damage scenarios. It provides baseline analyses using frequency-domain Rational Fraction Polynomials and time-domain Covariance-driven SSI for system identification, plus supervised (GMM) and unsupervised (Mahalanobis) SHM approaches. The dataset design emphasizes reproducibility and challenge, supporting virtual sensing, load estimation, and digital-twin applications while highlighting limitations of baseline methods. The open hd5 dataset, detailed experiment setup, and baseline results aim to accelerate development and robust comparison of advanced identification and SHM techniques on realistic, large-scale structures.

Abstract

Research developments for structural dynamics in the fields of design, system identification and structural health monitoring (SHM) have dramatically expanded the bounds of what can be learned from measured vibration data. However, significant challenges remain in the tasks of identification, prediction and evaluation of full-scale structures. A significant aid in the roadmap to the application of cutting-edge methods to the demands of in-service engineering structures, is the development of comprehensive benchmark datasets. With the aim of developing a useful and worthwhile benchmark dataset for structural dynamics, an extensive testing campaign is presented here. This recent campaign was performed on a decommissioned BAE system Hawk T1A aircraft at the Laboratory for Verification and Validation (LVV) in Sheffield. The aim of this paper is to present the dataset, providing details on the structure, experimental design, and data acquired. The collected data is made freely and openly available with the intention that it serve as a benchmark dataset for challenges in full-scale structural dynamics. Here, the details pertaining to two test phases (frequency and time domain) are presented. So as to ensure that the presented dataset is able to function as a benchmark, some baseline-level results are additionally presented for the tasks of identification and prediction, using standard approaches. It is envisaged that advanced methodologies will demonstrate superiority by favourable comparison with the results presented here. Finally, some dataset-specific challenges are described, with a view to form a hierarchy of tasks and frame discussion over their relative difficulty.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 34 equations, 17 figures, 4 tables)

This paper contains 22 sections, 34 equations, 17 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (17)

  • Figure 1: Images of BAE systems Hawk T1A aircraft.
  • Figure 2: Testing regime for dataset. For the damaged tests, the acronyms represent the locations of the added mass, where TLE, RLE, and CTE stand for tip-leading-edge, root-leading-edge, and central-trailing-edge, respectively. The weight numbers are ID-representations, the value of mass is provided in the experiment details.
  • Figure 3: Sensor layout on the wing, also indicating the locations of the shaker and additional masses.
  • Figure 4: Control algorithm process flow, indicating the total workflow for one repeat of a test.
  • Figure 5: Examples of the target driver PSDs for (left) random phase and (right) odd phase multisine types. The top plots show the target PSD power in terms of dB, and the bottom plots show the corresponding phase.
  • ...and 12 more figures