Flip graph and arc complex finite rigidity
Chandrika Sadanand, Emily Shinkle
TL;DR
The paper addresses finite rigidity for combinatorial models of surfaces, focusing on the arc complex $\mathcal{A}(S)$ and the flip graph $\mathcal{F}(S)$. It leverages a natural duality embedding of $\mathcal{F}(S)$ into $\mathcal{A}(S)$ to transfer finite rigidity from the flip graph to the arc complex, yielding a new finite rigidity result for $\mathcal{A}(S)$ that extends to surfaces with boundary. The main contribution is a constructive bridge: a finite rigid subgraph $\mathcal{X}_{\mathcal{F}}\subseteq \mathcal{F}(S)$ gives rise to a finite rigid subcomplex $\mathcal{X}_{\mathcal{A}}=\cup_{T\in \mathcal{X}_{\mathcal{F}}} \pi(T)$ in $\mathcal{A}(S)$, ensuring unique extensions of injective maps to homeomorphisms. This provides a broad, unified method to establish arc complex rigidity beyond previously known cases and highlights limitations in the converse direction.
Abstract
A subcomplex $\mathcal{X}$ of a cell complex $\mathcal{C}$ is called \emph{rigid} with respect to another cell complex $\mathcal{C}'$ if every injective simplicial map $λ:\mathcal{X} \rightarrow \mathcal{C}'$ has a unique extension to an injective simplicial map $φ:\mathcal{C}\rightarrow \mathcal{C}'$. We say that a cell complex exhibits \emph{finite rigidity} if it contains a finite rigid subcomplex. Given a surface with marked points, its \textit{flip graph} and \textit{arc complex} are simplicial complexes indexing the triangulations and the arcs between marked points, respectively. In this paper, we leverage the fact that the flip graph can be embedded in the arc complex as its dual to show that finite rigidity of the flip graph implies finite rigidity of the arc complex. Thus, a recent result of the second author on the finite rigidity of the flip graph implies finite rigidity of the arc complex for a broad class of surfaces. Notably, this includes surfaces with boundary -- a setting where finite rigidity of the arc complex was previously unknown.
