Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Online Mechanism Design with Predictions

Eric Balkanski, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Xizhi Tan, Cherlin Zhu

TL;DR

The paper introduces learning-augmented online mechanism design for dynamic single-item auctions, marrying predictions about private bidder values with online, strategyproof decision-making. It presents the Three-Phase Auction, a parameterized mechanism that achieves an $\alpha$-consistent revenue with respect to the highest value $v_{(1)}$ and a robustness of $\frac{1-\alpha^2}{4}$ against the offline second-highest value $v_{(2)}$, and proves this trade-off is optimal within a broad auction family. An extension, the Error-Tolerant Auction, ties revenue guarantees to prediction quality via a parameter $\gamma$ and a quality measure $q$, yielding favorable performance when the prediction is reasonably accurate. The paper also provides tight impossibility results, showing that without predictions or within certain families, the $1/4$-robustness and the consistency-robustness trade-off cannot be improved beyond the established bounds, thereby validating the optimality of the Three-Phase framework. Overall, the work advances online mechanism design by delivering prediction-augmented strategies with provable, near-optimal consistency-robustness guarantees and practical extensions to account for prediction errors.

Abstract

Aiming to overcome some of the limitations of worst-case analysis, the recently proposed framework of "algorithms with predictions" allows algorithms to be augmented with a (possibly erroneous) machine-learned prediction that they can use as a guide. In this framework, the goal is to obtain improved guarantees when the prediction is correct, which is called \emph{consistency}, while simultaneously guaranteeing some worst-case bounds even when the prediction is arbitrarily wrong, which is called \emph{robustness}. The vast majority of the work on this framework has focused on a refined analysis of online algorithms augmented with predictions regarding the future input. A subsequent line of work has also successfully adapted this framework to mechanism design, where the prediction is regarding the private information of strategic agents. In this paper, we initiate the study of online mechanism design with predictions, which combines the challenges of online algorithms with predictions and mechanism design with predictions. We consider the well-studied problem of designing a revenue-maximizing auction to sell a single item to strategic bidders who arrive and depart over time, each with an unknown, private, value for the item. We study the learning-augmented version of this problem where the auction designer is given a prediction regarding the maximum value over all agents. Our main result is a strategyproof mechanism whose revenue guarantees are $α$-consistent with respect to the highest value and $(1-α^2)/4$-robust with respect to the second-highest value, for $α\in [0,1]$. We show that this tradeoff is optimal within a broad and natural family of auctions, meaning that any $α$-consistent mechanism in that family has robustness at most $(1-α^2)/4$. Finally, we extend our mechanism to also achieve expected revenues proportional to the prediction quality.

Online Mechanism Design with Predictions

TL;DR

The paper introduces learning-augmented online mechanism design for dynamic single-item auctions, marrying predictions about private bidder values with online, strategyproof decision-making. It presents the Three-Phase Auction, a parameterized mechanism that achieves an -consistent revenue with respect to the highest value and a robustness of against the offline second-highest value , and proves this trade-off is optimal within a broad auction family. An extension, the Error-Tolerant Auction, ties revenue guarantees to prediction quality via a parameter and a quality measure , yielding favorable performance when the prediction is reasonably accurate. The paper also provides tight impossibility results, showing that without predictions or within certain families, the -robustness and the consistency-robustness trade-off cannot be improved beyond the established bounds, thereby validating the optimality of the Three-Phase framework. Overall, the work advances online mechanism design by delivering prediction-augmented strategies with provable, near-optimal consistency-robustness guarantees and practical extensions to account for prediction errors.

Abstract

Aiming to overcome some of the limitations of worst-case analysis, the recently proposed framework of "algorithms with predictions" allows algorithms to be augmented with a (possibly erroneous) machine-learned prediction that they can use as a guide. In this framework, the goal is to obtain improved guarantees when the prediction is correct, which is called \emph{consistency}, while simultaneously guaranteeing some worst-case bounds even when the prediction is arbitrarily wrong, which is called \emph{robustness}. The vast majority of the work on this framework has focused on a refined analysis of online algorithms augmented with predictions regarding the future input. A subsequent line of work has also successfully adapted this framework to mechanism design, where the prediction is regarding the private information of strategic agents. In this paper, we initiate the study of online mechanism design with predictions, which combines the challenges of online algorithms with predictions and mechanism design with predictions. We consider the well-studied problem of designing a revenue-maximizing auction to sell a single item to strategic bidders who arrive and depart over time, each with an unknown, private, value for the item. We study the learning-augmented version of this problem where the auction designer is given a prediction regarding the maximum value over all agents. Our main result is a strategyproof mechanism whose revenue guarantees are -consistent with respect to the highest value and -robust with respect to the second-highest value, for . We show that this tradeoff is optimal within a broad and natural family of auctions, meaning that any -consistent mechanism in that family has robustness at most . Finally, we extend our mechanism to also achieve expected revenues proportional to the prediction quality.
Paper Structure (34 sections, 45 theorems, 48 equations, 1 figure, 2 algorithms)

This paper contains 34 sections, 45 theorems, 48 equations, 1 figure, 2 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 1

The Three-Phase learning-augmented online auction is deterministic, strategyproof, and for any $\alpha \in [0,1]$ such that $\alpha n \in \mathbb{N} \text{ and } \frac{1-\alpha}{2}n \in \mathbb{N}$ the expected revenue it extracts guarantees $\alpha$-consistency with respect to the first-best revenu

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The robustness-consistency trade-off achieved by the Three-Phase auction and the trade-off achieved by convex combinations of the auction that optimizes consistency by completely trusting the predictions and the auction that optimizes robustness by ignoring the predictions.

Theorems & Definitions (82)

  • Theorem
  • proof
  • Theorem 2
  • Lemma 3
  • proof
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • Lemma 5
  • proof
  • Lemma 5
  • ...and 72 more