Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Identifying and Mitigating Privacy Risks Stemming from Language Models: A Survey

Victoria Smith, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Carolyn Ashurst, Adrian Weller

TL;DR

This survey provides a comprehensive framework for understanding privacy risks in Large Language Models, focusing on training-data memorization and potential leakage. It introduces a taxonomy across architectures and development phases, surveys three main attack classes (membership inference, data extraction, attribute inference), and reviews defense strategies spanning data preprocessing, privacy-preserving training, and post-training unlearning/editing. The paper highlights practical vulnerabilities, including the impact of model size, data duplication, and fine-tuning, and discusses the trade-offs between privacy guarantees and model utility. It also outlines gaps and future research directions for safer deployment of LLMs in privacy-sensitive domains.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown greatly enhanced performance in recent years, attributed to increased size and extensive training data. This advancement has led to widespread interest and adoption across industries and the public. However, training data memorization in Machine Learning models scales with model size, particularly concerning for LLMs. Memorized text sequences have the potential to be directly leaked from LLMs, posing a serious threat to data privacy. Various techniques have been developed to attack LLMs and extract their training data. As these models continue to grow, this issue becomes increasingly critical. To help researchers and policymakers understand the state of knowledge around privacy attacks and mitigations, including where more work is needed, we present the first SoK on data privacy for LLMs. We (i) identify a taxonomy of salient dimensions where attacks differ on LLMs, (ii) systematize existing attacks, using our taxonomy of dimensions to highlight key trends, (iii) survey existing mitigation strategies, highlighting their strengths and limitations, and (iv) identify key gaps, demonstrating open problems and areas for concern.

Identifying and Mitigating Privacy Risks Stemming from Language Models: A Survey

TL;DR

This survey provides a comprehensive framework for understanding privacy risks in Large Language Models, focusing on training-data memorization and potential leakage. It introduces a taxonomy across architectures and development phases, surveys three main attack classes (membership inference, data extraction, attribute inference), and reviews defense strategies spanning data preprocessing, privacy-preserving training, and post-training unlearning/editing. The paper highlights practical vulnerabilities, including the impact of model size, data duplication, and fine-tuning, and discusses the trade-offs between privacy guarantees and model utility. It also outlines gaps and future research directions for safer deployment of LLMs in privacy-sensitive domains.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown greatly enhanced performance in recent years, attributed to increased size and extensive training data. This advancement has led to widespread interest and adoption across industries and the public. However, training data memorization in Machine Learning models scales with model size, particularly concerning for LLMs. Memorized text sequences have the potential to be directly leaked from LLMs, posing a serious threat to data privacy. Various techniques have been developed to attack LLMs and extract their training data. As these models continue to grow, this issue becomes increasingly critical. To help researchers and policymakers understand the state of knowledge around privacy attacks and mitigations, including where more work is needed, we present the first SoK on data privacy for LLMs. We (i) identify a taxonomy of salient dimensions where attacks differ on LLMs, (ii) systematize existing attacks, using our taxonomy of dimensions to highlight key trends, (iii) survey existing mitigation strategies, highlighting their strengths and limitations, and (iv) identify key gaps, demonstrating open problems and areas for concern.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 1 equation, 4 tables)