Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An FPRAS for two terminal reliability in directed acyclic graphs

Weiming Feng, Heng Guo

TL;DR

A fully polynomial-time randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS) for two terminal reliability in directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and shows the complementing problem of approximating two terminal unreliability in DAGs is #BIS-hard.

Abstract

We give a fully polynomial-time randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS) for two terminal reliability in directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). In contrast, we also show the complementing problem of approximating two terminal unreliability in DAGs is #BIS-hard.

An FPRAS for two terminal reliability in directed acyclic graphs

TL;DR

A fully polynomial-time randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS) for two terminal reliability in directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and shows the complementing problem of approximating two terminal unreliability in DAGs is #BIS-hard.

Abstract

We give a fully polynomial-time randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS) for two terminal reliability in directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). In contrast, we also show the complementing problem of approximating two terminal unreliability in DAGs is #BIS-hard.
Paper Structure (17 sections, 15 theorems, 100 equations, 1 figure, 4 algorithms)

This paper contains 17 sections, 15 theorems, 100 equations, 1 figure, 4 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a directed acyclic graph (DAG), failure probabilities $\mathbf{q}=(q_e)_{e \in E} \in [0,1]^E$, two vertices $s,t\in V$, and $\varepsilon>0$. There is a randomized algorithm that takes $(G,\mathbf{q},s,t,\varepsilon)$ as inputs and outputs a $(1\pm\varepsilon)$-approximation to the

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: An illustration of sampling from $\pi_{u}$

Theorems & Definitions (31)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Lemma 3
  • Remark 4: Crash of Sample
  • Lemma 6
  • proof
  • Corollary 7
  • proof
  • Lemma 8
  • proof
  • ...and 21 more