On a Rankin-Selberg integral of three Hermitian cusp forms
Thanasis Bouganis, Rafail Psyroukis
TL;DR
The paper develops a unitary-group analogue of the Rankin–Selberg construction for a twisted spinor-type $L$-function by forming a triple product integral of a Siegel-type Hermitian Eisenstein series with two degree-2 Hermitian cusp forms and an elliptic cusp form, all of weight $k\equiv0\pmod4$. It derives a Dirichlet series $D_{F,G,h}(s)$ with analytic continuation and a functional equation, and, when $F$ lies in the Maass space, proves that $D_{F,G,h}(s)$ has an Euler product whose inert-prime factors match the twists of Gritsenko’s degree-6 $L$-function attached to $G$ by the elliptic form $h$. The inert-prime analysis yields a precise local factor $D_p^{(2)}(s)$ involving $L_p(f,k+s-2)$ and $L_p(f,k+s-2,(-4/p))$, while the split-prime case requires a GL$_4$-based factorization and yields a split-local formula in terms of Satake data and Jacobi coefficients. The work provides a pathway to algebraicity and $p$-adic interpolation phenomena for these twisted, higher-rank $L$-functions via triple products, extending Heim’s Siegel–Garrett framework to the unitary/Hermitian setting.
Abstract
Let $K = \mathbb{Q}(i)$. We study the Petersson inner product of a Hermitian Eisenstein series of Siegel type on the unitary group $U_{5}(K)$, diagonally-restricted on $U_2(K)\times U_2(K)\times U_1(K)$, against two Hermitian cuspidal eigenforms $F, G$ of degree $2$ and an elliptic cuspidal eigenform $h$ (seen as a Hermitian modular form of degree 1), all having weight $k \equiv 0 \pmod 4$. We obtain, through this consideration, an integral representation of a certain Dirichlet series, which has an analytic continuation to $\mathbb{C}$ and functional equation, due to the one of the Eisenstein series. By taking $F$ to belong in the Maass space, we are able to show that the Dirichlet series possesses an Euler product. Moreover, its $p$-factor for an inert prime $p$ can be essentially identified with the twist by $h$ of a degree six Euler factor attached to $G$ by Gritsenko. The question of whether the same holds for the primes that split remains unanswered here, even though we make considerable steps in that direction too. Our paper is inspired by a work of Heim, who considered a similar question in the case of Siegel modular forms.
