Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes

Elden Elmanto, Matthew Morrow

TL;DR

This work constructs motivic cohomology Z(j)^{mot} for qcqs equicharacteristic schemes by harnessing trace methods from K-theory, blending KH, TC, and syntomic/derived de Rham data into a motivic filtration on K(X). It proves central features including Beilinson–Lichtenbaum-type comparisons to étale and syntomic cohomology, a projective-bundle formula, pro cdh descent, and a robust relation to algebraic cycles and zero-cycles on surfaces. The theory recovers classical motivic cohomology on smooth varieties and interfaces with lisse motivic cohomology via Nesterenko–Suslin-type isomorphisms, while also delivering strong vanishing results such as motivic Soulé–Weibel vanishing. Extending to derived schemes, the construction provides a broad, non–A^1-invariant framework that coherently interpolates between cycle-theoretic and homotopy-theoretic perspectives, with potential applications to arithmetic and singular geometry. The paper also situates its approach among recent non–A^1-invariant motivic theories and pro-cdh/topological techniques, and it establishes precise comparison maps with existing motivic, lisse, and cdh-local theories. Finally, it connects the motivic framework to concrete cycle-theoretic descriptions, including zero-cycles on surfaces, thereby enriching the algebraic-cycle viewpoint in singular settings.

Abstract

We construct a theory of motivic cohomology for quasi-compact, quasi-separated schemes of equal characteristic, which is related to non-connective algebraic $K$-theory via an Atiyah--Hirzebruch spectral sequence, and to étale cohomology in the range predicted by Beilinson and Lichtenbaum. On smooth varieties over a field our theory recovers classical motivic cohomology, defined for example via Bloch's cycle complex. Our construction uses trace methods and (topological) cyclic homology. As predicted by the behaviour of algebraic $K$-theory, the motivic cohomology is in general sensitive to singularities, including non-reduced structure, and is not $\mathbb{A}^1$-invariant. It nevertheless has good geometric properties, satisfying for example the projective bundle formula and pro cdh descent. Further properties of the theory include a Nesterenko--Suslin comparison isomorphism to Milnor $K$-theory, and a vanishing range which simultaneously refines Weibel's conjecture about negative $K$-theory and a vanishing result of Soulé for the Adams eigenspaces of higher algebraic $K$-groups. We also explore the relation of the theory to algebraic cycles, showing in particular that the Levine--Weibel Chow group of zero cycles on a surface arises as a motivic cohomology group.

Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes

TL;DR

This work constructs motivic cohomology Z(j)^{mot} for qcqs equicharacteristic schemes by harnessing trace methods from K-theory, blending KH, TC, and syntomic/derived de Rham data into a motivic filtration on K(X). It proves central features including Beilinson–Lichtenbaum-type comparisons to étale and syntomic cohomology, a projective-bundle formula, pro cdh descent, and a robust relation to algebraic cycles and zero-cycles on surfaces. The theory recovers classical motivic cohomology on smooth varieties and interfaces with lisse motivic cohomology via Nesterenko–Suslin-type isomorphisms, while also delivering strong vanishing results such as motivic Soulé–Weibel vanishing. Extending to derived schemes, the construction provides a broad, non–A^1-invariant framework that coherently interpolates between cycle-theoretic and homotopy-theoretic perspectives, with potential applications to arithmetic and singular geometry. The paper also situates its approach among recent non–A^1-invariant motivic theories and pro-cdh/topological techniques, and it establishes precise comparison maps with existing motivic, lisse, and cdh-local theories. Finally, it connects the motivic framework to concrete cycle-theoretic descriptions, including zero-cycles on surfaces, thereby enriching the algebraic-cycle viewpoint in singular settings.

Abstract

We construct a theory of motivic cohomology for quasi-compact, quasi-separated schemes of equal characteristic, which is related to non-connective algebraic -theory via an Atiyah--Hirzebruch spectral sequence, and to étale cohomology in the range predicted by Beilinson and Lichtenbaum. On smooth varieties over a field our theory recovers classical motivic cohomology, defined for example via Bloch's cycle complex. Our construction uses trace methods and (topological) cyclic homology. As predicted by the behaviour of algebraic -theory, the motivic cohomology is in general sensitive to singularities, including non-reduced structure, and is not -invariant. It nevertheless has good geometric properties, satisfying for example the projective bundle formula and pro cdh descent. Further properties of the theory include a Nesterenko--Suslin comparison isomorphism to Milnor -theory, and a vanishing range which simultaneously refines Weibel's conjecture about negative -theory and a vanishing result of Soulé for the Adams eigenspaces of higher algebraic -groups. We also explore the relation of the theory to algebraic cycles, showing in particular that the Levine--Weibel Chow group of zero cycles on a surface arises as a motivic cohomology group.
Paper Structure (44 sections, 89 theorems, 225 equations)

This paper contains 44 sections, 89 theorems, 225 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

There exist finitary Nisnevich sheaves for $j\ge0$, such that the following properties hold for any qcqs $\mathbb{F}$-scheme $X$:

Theorems & Definitions (211)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3: See Thms. \ref{['thm_mot_vs_cdh']}, \ref{['thm:graded-pieces']}, and \ref{['thm:graded-pieces_charp']}
  • Proposition 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5: See Thms. \ref{['thm:graded-pieces']} and \ref{['thm:graded-pieces_charp']}
  • Corollary 1.6
  • Remark 1.7: Projective bundle formula
  • Theorem 1.8: Nesterenko--Suslin isomorphism; see Thm. \ref{['theorem_NS']}
  • Theorem 1.9: see Thm. \ref{['thm_lke_lej']}
  • Theorem 1.10: See Thm. \ref{['thm:lw-comparison']}
  • ...and 201 more