Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A non-Archimedean Arens--Eells isometric embedding theorem on valued fields

Yoshito Ishiki

TL;DR

The paper proves a non-Archimedean Arens–Eells–type embedding: for any non-Archimedean valued field $K$ and any ultrametric space $(X,d)$, there exists a valued-field extension $(L,\lVert\cdot\rVert)$ of $K$ and an isometric embedding $I:X\to L$ with $I(X)$ algebraically independent over $K$. The construction leverages Hahn fields and their $p$-adic analogues, notably $\mathbb{A}_{q,p}(G,\boldsymbol{k})$ built from Witt vectors, and employs a transfinite recursive argument to extend partial embeddings while preserving distances and algebraicity. A key technical theorem (the Preparations) enables the main embedding; the results also solve Broughan's conjecture by embedding Hp-valued spaces into $\mathrm{Fr}\mathbb{W}(\boldsymbol{k})$, and are extended to generalized ultrametric spaces valued in linearly ordered groups. Altogether, the work connects non-Archimedean metric embedding with explicit field-theoretic constructions, enabling precise representations of ultrametric structures inside valued fields and offering a framework for further generalizations and applications.

Abstract

In 1959, Arens and Eells proved that every metric space can be isometrically embedded into a normed linear space as a closed subset. In later years, in the paper on a short proof of the Arens--Eells theorem, Michael implicitly pointed out that the Arens--Eells theorem follows from the statement that every metric space can be isometrically embedded into a normed linear space as a linearly independent subset. In this paper, we prove a non-Archimedean analogue of the Arens--Eells isometric embedding theorem, which states that for every non-Archimedean valued field $K$, every ultrametric space can be isometrically embedded into a non-Archimedean valued field that is a valued field extension of $K$ such that the image of the embedding is algebraically independent over $K$.

A non-Archimedean Arens--Eells isometric embedding theorem on valued fields

TL;DR

The paper proves a non-Archimedean Arens–Eells–type embedding: for any non-Archimedean valued field and any ultrametric space , there exists a valued-field extension of and an isometric embedding with algebraically independent over . The construction leverages Hahn fields and their -adic analogues, notably built from Witt vectors, and employs a transfinite recursive argument to extend partial embeddings while preserving distances and algebraicity. A key technical theorem (the Preparations) enables the main embedding; the results also solve Broughan's conjecture by embedding Hp-valued spaces into , and are extended to generalized ultrametric spaces valued in linearly ordered groups. Altogether, the work connects non-Archimedean metric embedding with explicit field-theoretic constructions, enabling precise representations of ultrametric structures inside valued fields and offering a framework for further generalizations and applications.

Abstract

In 1959, Arens and Eells proved that every metric space can be isometrically embedded into a normed linear space as a closed subset. In later years, in the paper on a short proof of the Arens--Eells theorem, Michael implicitly pointed out that the Arens--Eells theorem follows from the statement that every metric space can be isometrically embedded into a normed linear space as a linearly independent subset. In this paper, we prove a non-Archimedean analogue of the Arens--Eells isometric embedding theorem, which states that for every non-Archimedean valued field , every ultrametric space can be isometrically embedded into a non-Archimedean valued field that is a valued field extension of such that the image of the embedding is algebraically independent over .
Paper Structure (16 sections, 29 theorems, 25 equations)

This paper contains 16 sections, 29 theorems, 25 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Let $X$ be a set, and $d\colon X\times X\to \mathbb{R}$ be a symmetric function, i.e., $d(x, y)=d(y, x)$ for all $x, y\in X$. Then $d$ satisfies the strong triangle inequality: $d(x, y)\le d(x, z)\lor d(z, y)$ if and only if for every triple $x, y, z\in X$, the inequality $d(x, z)<d(z, y)$ implies $

Theorems & Definitions (63)

  • Conjecture 1.1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • Remark 2.1
  • Proposition 2.4
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.5
  • Proposition 2.6
  • proof
  • ...and 53 more