Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Structurally Informed Data Assimilation Approach for Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations

Tongtong Li, Anne Gelb, Yoonsang Lee

TL;DR

This investigation designs a new structurally informed non-Gaussian prior that exploits statistical information from the simulated state variables and constructs a new weighting matrix based on the second moment of the gradient information of the state variable to replace the prior covariance matrix used for model/data compromise in the ETKF data assimilation framework.

Abstract

Ensemble transform Kalman filtering (ETKF) data assimilation is often used to combine available observations with numerical simulations to obtain statistically accurate and reliable state representations in dynamical systems. However, it is well known that the commonly used Gaussian distribution assumption introduces biases for state variables that admit discontinuous profiles, which are prevalent in nonlinear partial differential equations. This investigation designs a new structurally informed non-Gaussian prior that exploits statistical information from the simulated state variables. In particular, we construct a new weighting matrix based on the second moment of the gradient information of the state variable to replace the prior covariance matrix used for model/data compromise in the ETKF data assimilation framework. We further adapt our weighting matrix to include information in discontinuity regions via a clustering technique. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that this new approach yields more accurate estimates than those obtained using ETKF on shallow water equations, even when ETKF is enhanced with inflation and localization techniques.

A Structurally Informed Data Assimilation Approach for Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations

TL;DR

This investigation designs a new structurally informed non-Gaussian prior that exploits statistical information from the simulated state variables and constructs a new weighting matrix based on the second moment of the gradient information of the state variable to replace the prior covariance matrix used for model/data compromise in the ETKF data assimilation framework.

Abstract

Ensemble transform Kalman filtering (ETKF) data assimilation is often used to combine available observations with numerical simulations to obtain statistically accurate and reliable state representations in dynamical systems. However, it is well known that the commonly used Gaussian distribution assumption introduces biases for state variables that admit discontinuous profiles, which are prevalent in nonlinear partial differential equations. This investigation designs a new structurally informed non-Gaussian prior that exploits statistical information from the simulated state variables. In particular, we construct a new weighting matrix based on the second moment of the gradient information of the state variable to replace the prior covariance matrix used for model/data compromise in the ETKF data assimilation framework. We further adapt our weighting matrix to include information in discontinuity regions via a clustering technique. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that this new approach yields more accurate estimates than those obtained using ETKF on shallow water equations, even when ETKF is enhanced with inflation and localization techniques.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 68 equations, 9 figures, 2 algorithms)

This paper contains 19 sections, 68 equations, 9 figures, 2 algorithms.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: The mean solution of $h(x,t)$, $t = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15$ in \ref{['eq:SWE']} using fifth order WENO with $\Delta x=10^{-2}$ and $\Delta t=10^{-5}$ for $K = 100$ perturbed initial conditions (left). The corresponding variance (middle) and gradient second moment (right).
  • Figure 2: The mean solution of the prior ensembles of $h(x,t)$, $t = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15$ as determined by Algorithm \ref{['alg:mETKF']}. The corresponding variance (middle) and gradient second moment (right).
  • Figure 3: (top) Numerical solutions for the posterior mean of depth $h(x,0.15)$ as obtained by (left) Algorithm \ref{['alg:ETKF']} and (right) Algorithm \ref{['alg:mETKF']}. (bottom) Corresponding pointwise posterior error defined by \ref{['eq:error']}.
  • Figure 4: Comparison of the relative error in \ref{['eq:err']} produced by Algorithm \ref{['alg:ETKF']} and Algorithm \ref{['alg:mETKF']} in the time domain $[0.03,0.15]$.
  • Figure 5: (top) Numerical solutions for the posterior mean of depth $h(x,0.15)$ as obtained by (left) Algorithm \ref{['alg:ETKF']}, (middle) Algorithm \ref{['alg:mETKF']} without clustering and (right) Algorithm \ref{['alg:mETKF']} with clustering. (bottom) Corresponding pointwise posterior error defined by \ref{['eq:error']}.
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (5)

  • Remark 2.1
  • Remark 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Remark 3.3
  • Remark 4.1