Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Hilbert-Mumford Criterion for polystability for actions of real reductive Lie groups

Leonardo Biliotti, Oluwagbenga Joshua Windare

TL;DR

The article extends the Hilbert-Mumford criterion to polystability for real reductive Lie groups acting on real submanifolds of Kähler manifolds by employing a gradient map $\mu_\mathfrak{p}: X\to \mathfrak{p}$ and a Kempf–Ness framework. It defines a maximal weight function $\lambda_x$ on the boundary at infinity of the symmetric space $M=G/K$ and proves that polystability of a point $x$ is characterized by $\lambda_x\ge0$ with boundary zeros connected along geodesics, without requiring a completeness assumption. The development integrates the structure of compatible subgroups, the symmetric-space geometry, and the parabolic-reduction mechanism to provide a concrete numerical criterion in terms of $\lambda_x$ and the gradient map $\mu_\mathfrak{p}$. This extends noncompact real-group actions in a GIT-like framework, enabling robust quotients and moduli constructions in real-analytic and Kähler settings. The results offer a practical tool for identifying polystable orbits via boundary data and gradient-flow behavior, with potential applications in symplectic and complex geometry where real reductive symmetries arise.

Abstract

We presented a Hilbert-Mumford criterion for polystablility associated with an action of a real reductive Lie group $G$ on a real submanifold $X$ of a Kahler manifold $Z$. Suppose the action of a compact Lie group with Lie algebra $\mathfrak{u}$ extends holomorphically to an action of the complexified group $U^\mathbb{C}$ and that the $U$-action on $Z$ is Hamiltonian. If $G\subset U^\mathbb{C}$ is compatible, there is a corresponding gradient map $μ_\mathfrak{p}: X\to \mathfrak{p}$, where $\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{k} \oplus \mathfrak{p}$ is a Cartan decomposition of the Lie algebra of $G$. Under some mild restrictions on the $G$-action on $X,$ we characterize which $G$-orbits in $X$ intersect $μ_\mathfrak{p}^{-1}(0)$ in terms of the maximal weight function, which we viewed as a collection of maps defined on the boundary at infinity ($\partial_\infty G/K$) of the symmetric space $G/K$.

A Hilbert-Mumford Criterion for polystability for actions of real reductive Lie groups

TL;DR

The article extends the Hilbert-Mumford criterion to polystability for real reductive Lie groups acting on real submanifolds of Kähler manifolds by employing a gradient map and a Kempf–Ness framework. It defines a maximal weight function on the boundary at infinity of the symmetric space and proves that polystability of a point is characterized by with boundary zeros connected along geodesics, without requiring a completeness assumption. The development integrates the structure of compatible subgroups, the symmetric-space geometry, and the parabolic-reduction mechanism to provide a concrete numerical criterion in terms of and the gradient map . This extends noncompact real-group actions in a GIT-like framework, enabling robust quotients and moduli constructions in real-analytic and Kähler settings. The results offer a practical tool for identifying polystable orbits via boundary data and gradient-flow behavior, with potential applications in symplectic and complex geometry where real reductive symmetries arise.

Abstract

We presented a Hilbert-Mumford criterion for polystablility associated with an action of a real reductive Lie group on a real submanifold of a Kahler manifold . Suppose the action of a compact Lie group with Lie algebra extends holomorphically to an action of the complexified group and that the -action on is Hamiltonian. If is compatible, there is a corresponding gradient map , where is a Cartan decomposition of the Lie algebra of . Under some mild restrictions on the -action on we characterize which -orbits in intersect in terms of the maximal weight function, which we viewed as a collection of maps defined on the boundary at infinity () of the symmetric space .
Paper Structure (6 sections, 20 theorems, 72 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 20 theorems, 72 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

$\ $

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Lemma 2.1: LA
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Definition 3.1
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Definition 4.1
  • Proposition 4.1
  • Proposition 4.2
  • Lemma 4.3
  • ...and 26 more