Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Deforming reducible representations of surface and 2-orbifold groups

Joan Porti

TL;DR

This work analyzes how deforming a $\mathbb{C}$-irreducible representation of a surface/2-orbifold group inside $\mathrm{SL}_{n}(\mathbb{R})$ behaves when the representation is embedded into $\mathrm{SL}_{n+1}(\mathbb{R})$. It establishes that the associated point in the real character variety becomes singular, with a precise local model: the germ is a cone over a unit tangent bundle (or its projective/antipodal variants) determined by the dimension $d=\dim H^1(\mathcal{O}^2,\mathbb{R}^{n}_{\rho})$ and the parity of $n+1$, and by boundary data. The results extend to non-orientable orbifolds and have concrete consequences for convex projective structures and projective deformations of hyperbolic 3-orbifolds, including a quadratic-type singularity description via Goldman–Millson theory. By combining slice techniques, Lie-algebra decompositions, and cohomological obstructions, the paper provides a detailed, topological understanding of how higher-rank deformations interact with reducibility and end structures. These findings illuminate the geometry of higher-rank representation spaces and their applications to projective geometry on orbifolds and 3-manifolds.

Abstract

For a compact 2-orbifold with negative Euler characteristic $\mathcal O^2$, the variety of characters of $π_1(\mathcal O^2)$ in $\mathrm{SL}_{n}(\mathbb R)$ is a non-singular manifold at $\mathbb C$-irreducible representations. In this paper we prove that when a $\mathbb C$-irreducible representation of $π_1(\mathcal O^2)$ in $\mathrm{SL}_{n}(\mathbb R)$ is viewed in $\mathrm{SL}_{n+1}(\mathbb R)$, then the variety of characters is singular, and we describe the singularity.

Deforming reducible representations of surface and 2-orbifold groups

TL;DR

This work analyzes how deforming a -irreducible representation of a surface/2-orbifold group inside behaves when the representation is embedded into . It establishes that the associated point in the real character variety becomes singular, with a precise local model: the germ is a cone over a unit tangent bundle (or its projective/antipodal variants) determined by the dimension and the parity of , and by boundary data. The results extend to non-orientable orbifolds and have concrete consequences for convex projective structures and projective deformations of hyperbolic 3-orbifolds, including a quadratic-type singularity description via Goldman–Millson theory. By combining slice techniques, Lie-algebra decompositions, and cohomological obstructions, the paper provides a detailed, topological understanding of how higher-rank deformations interact with reducibility and end structures. These findings illuminate the geometry of higher-rank representation spaces and their applications to projective geometry on orbifolds and 3-manifolds.

Abstract

For a compact 2-orbifold with negative Euler characteristic , the variety of characters of in is a non-singular manifold at -irreducible representations. In this paper we prove that when a -irreducible representation of in is viewed in , then the variety of characters is singular, and we describe the singularity.
Paper Structure (25 sections, 38 theorems, 131 equations, 1 figure, 1 table)

This paper contains 25 sections, 38 theorems, 131 equations, 1 figure, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\mathcal{O}^2$ be a compact and orientable 2-orbifold, satisfying $\chi(\mathcal{O}^2)<0$. Let $\chi_\rho\in X( \mathcal{O}^2, \mathrm{SL}_{n}(\mathbb R) )$ be the character of a $\mathbb C$-irreducible representation $\rho$, $d= \dim(H^1(\mathcal{O}^2,\mathbb R^n_\rho))$, and $b= \dim(H^1(\ma where $X$ is as in Table Table:Table1 and $\mathbb R^p\times \{0\}\times\{0\}$ corresponds to a smo

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The four examples in Section \ref{['section:Examples']}. The orbifold $\mathcal{O}^2_1$ is the orientation covering of $\mathcal{O}^2_2$, and $\mathcal{O}^2_3$, of $\mathcal{O}^2_4$ (for a suitable choice of labels).

Theorems & Definitions (77)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 2.1: LunaRichardsonSlodowy
  • Definition 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4: RichardsonDuke
  • Definition 2.5
  • Theorem 2.6: JohnsonMillson
  • Lemma 2.7
  • proof
  • ...and 67 more