Emoji Promotes Developer Participation and Issue Resolution on GitHub
Yuhang Zhou, Xuan Lu, Ge Gao, Qiaozhu Mei, Wei Ai
TL;DR
This study investigates whether emoji usage on GitHub issues causally affects developer participation and issue resolution in a remote-work setting. It uses a large-scale dataset from GHTorrent (over 200k issues, including 14.7k emoji-containing issues) and applies propensity score matching with rich confounder controls (textual features, topic modeling, author and repository metrics) to estimate causal effects. The results show that emojis significantly increase participation and speed up resolution, with effects varying by issue type and stronger signals when emojis align with issue semantics; sensitivity analyses support robustness to unobserved confounders. The findings offer practical guidance for emoji use to improve communication efficiency in distributed software teams while acknowledging limitations and the need for broader validation across languages and contexts.
Abstract
Although remote working is increasingly adopted during the pandemic, many are concerned by the low-efficiency in the remote working. Missing in text-based communication are non-verbal cues such as facial expressions and body language, which hinders the effective communication and negatively impacts the work outcomes. Prevalent on social media platforms, emojis, as alternative non-verbal cues, are gaining popularity in the virtual workspaces well. In this paper, we study how emoji usage influences developer participation and issue resolution in virtual workspaces. To this end, we collect GitHub issues for a one-year period and apply causal inference techniques to measure the causal effect of emojis on the outcome of issues, controlling for confounders such as issue content, repository, and author information. We find that emojis can significantly reduce the resolution time of issues and attract more user participation. We also compare the heterogeneous effect on different types of issues. These findings deepen our understanding of the developer communities, and they provide design implications on how to facilitate interactions and broaden developer participation.
