Improving Generalization in Reinforcement Learning Training Regimes for Social Robot Navigation
Adam Sigal, Hsiu-Chin Lin, AJung Moon
TL;DR
The paper tackles the generalization gap in RL-based social navigation by showing that training in overly simple environments with homogeneous pedestrian behavior fails to transfer to realistic, crowded spaces. It introduces curriculum learning and diversified pedestrian dynamics (ORCA and Social Force) to train three RL models (CADRL, LSTM-RL, SARL) under four regimes, then evaluates them in larger, unseen Diverse-4 environments that simulate complex crowds. The study finds that the curriculum plus diversity approach, particularly when combined with SARL (CD-SARL), yields the best generalization, reducing pedestrian discomfort while maintaining reasonable efficiency and safety. These findings challenge prior work that reports strong results only in simplistic settings and underscore the need for richer training curricula and out-of-distribution evaluation for social robot navigation.
Abstract
In order for autonomous mobile robots to navigate in human spaces, they must abide by our social norms. Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as an effective method to train sequential decision-making policies that are able to respect these norms. However, a large portion of existing work in the field conducts both RL training and testing in simplistic environments. This limits the generalization potential of these models to unseen environments, and the meaningfulness of their reported results. We propose a method to improve the generalization performance of RL social navigation methods using curriculum learning. By employing multiple environment types and by modeling pedestrians using multiple dynamics models, we are able to progressively diversify and escalate difficulty in training. Our results show that the use of curriculum learning in training can be used to achieve better generalization performance than previous training methods. We also show that results presented in many existing state-of-the-art RL social navigation works do not evaluate their methods outside of their training environments, and thus do not reflect their policies' failure to adequately generalize to out-of-distribution scenarios. In response, we validate our training approach on larger and more crowded testing environments than those used in training, allowing for more meaningful measurements of model performance.
