Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Solving Attention Kernel Regression Problem via Pre-conditioner

Zhao Song, Junze Yin, Lichen Zhang

TL;DR

The paper tackles the computational bottleneck of attention in large models by introducing proxy problems that approximate the attention matrix: a matrix-exponential proxy using powers of $A^\top A$ and an attention-kernel proxy via $\exp(AA^\top)$. It develops fast, randomized algorithms based on sketching and preconditioning to solve regression problems against these proxies, achieving near-linear time in $n$ and $d$ under practical regimes, with provable error bounds and high-probability guarantees. The core contributions include (i) efficient algorithms for regressing against $(A^\top A)^j$ and $A(A^\top A)^j$ with explicit time bounds, (ii) a method to approximate $\exp(AA^\top)$ via spectral-approximate sketches and a preconditioner to enable fast gradient-based solves, and (iii) a thorough analysis relating these subproblems to matrix-exponential expansions, offering an alternative perspective on efficient attention-approximation techniques. These results have potential practical impact for speeding up attention-related computations in transformers and other attention-based architectures, especially in large-scale or structured-data settings.

Abstract

The attention mechanism is the key to large language models, and the attention matrix serves as an algorithmic and computational bottleneck for such a scheme. In this paper, we define two problems, motivated by designing fast algorithms for proxy of attention matrix and solving regressions against them. Given an input matrix $A\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times d}$ with $n\gg d$ and a response vector $b$, we first consider the matrix exponential of the matrix $A^\top A$ as a proxy, and we in turn design algorithms for two types of regression problems: $\min_{x\in \mathbb{R}^d}\|(A^\top A)^jx-b\|_2$ and $\min_{x\in \mathbb{R}^d}\|A(A^\top A)^jx-b\|_2$ for any positive integer $j$. Studying algorithms for these regressions is essential, as matrix exponential can be approximated term-by-term via these smaller problems. The second proxy is applying exponential entrywise to the Gram matrix, denoted by $\exp(AA^\top)$ and solving the regression $\min_{x\in \mathbb{R}^n}\|\exp(AA^\top)x-b \|_2$. We call this problem the attention kernel regression problem, as the matrix $\exp(AA^\top)$ could be viewed as a kernel function with respect to $A$. We design fast algorithms for these regression problems, based on sketching and preconditioning. We hope these efforts will provide an alternative perspective of studying efficient approximation of attention matrices.

Solving Attention Kernel Regression Problem via Pre-conditioner

TL;DR

The paper tackles the computational bottleneck of attention in large models by introducing proxy problems that approximate the attention matrix: a matrix-exponential proxy using powers of and an attention-kernel proxy via . It develops fast, randomized algorithms based on sketching and preconditioning to solve regression problems against these proxies, achieving near-linear time in and under practical regimes, with provable error bounds and high-probability guarantees. The core contributions include (i) efficient algorithms for regressing against and with explicit time bounds, (ii) a method to approximate via spectral-approximate sketches and a preconditioner to enable fast gradient-based solves, and (iii) a thorough analysis relating these subproblems to matrix-exponential expansions, offering an alternative perspective on efficient attention-approximation techniques. These results have potential practical impact for speeding up attention-related computations in transformers and other attention-based architectures, especially in large-scale or structured-data settings.

Abstract

The attention mechanism is the key to large language models, and the attention matrix serves as an algorithmic and computational bottleneck for such a scheme. In this paper, we define two problems, motivated by designing fast algorithms for proxy of attention matrix and solving regressions against them. Given an input matrix with and a response vector , we first consider the matrix exponential of the matrix as a proxy, and we in turn design algorithms for two types of regression problems: and for any positive integer . Studying algorithms for these regressions is essential, as matrix exponential can be approximated term-by-term via these smaller problems. The second proxy is applying exponential entrywise to the Gram matrix, denoted by and solving the regression . We call this problem the attention kernel regression problem, as the matrix could be viewed as a kernel function with respect to . We design fast algorithms for these regression problems, based on sketching and preconditioning. We hope these efforts will provide an alternative perspective of studying efficient approximation of attention matrices.
Paper Structure (48 sections, 24 theorems, 239 equations, 7 figures, 8 algorithms)

This paper contains 48 sections, 24 theorems, 239 equations, 7 figures, 8 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 1.4

Let $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$, $b \in \mathbb{R}^d$, and $\kappa$ denote the condition number of $A$. Let $\epsilon_{\mathrm{final}}, \delta_{\mathrm{final}} \in (0,0.1)$. For the regression problem shown in Eq. eq:informal_even, there exists an algorithm (Algorithm alg:even) that runs in time and outputs a vector $x' \in \mathbb{R}^d$ such that $\| (A^\top A)^j x' - b \|_2 \leq \epsilon_{\

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: The visualization of the matrix $D(X) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. Given $Q, K , V \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d}$ and $X \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$, we first compute $XQK^\top X^\top \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. Then, we find $\exp(XQK^\top X^\top) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. After that, we multiply $\exp(XQK^\top X^\top) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ with the vector ${\bf 1}_n \in \mathbb{R}^{n}$. Finally, we use $\mathop{\mathrm{diag}}\nolimits(\cdot)$ to transform $\exp(XQK^\top X^\top) {\bf 1}_n \in \mathbb{R}^n$ into a diagonal matrix, which is $D(X) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. In this figure, green matrices/vectors represent the terms that are given; the purple matrix represents the term after one operation; the red vector represents the term after two operations; the blue matrix represents the term after three operations.
  • Figure 2: The visualization of the attention computation (see Eq. \ref{['eq:attention']}). Since we present the visualization of how we get $D(X) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ and $\exp(XQK^\top X^\top) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ in Figure \ref{['fig:DX']}, we regard them as given. Moreover, we are also given $V \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d}$ and $X \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$. We compute their product, namely $D(X)^{-1} \exp(X Q K^\top X^\top) X V$. In this figure, green matrices represent the terms that are given, and the purple matrix represents the term after one operation.
  • Figure 3: The visualization of the matrix $D \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. Given $Q, K, V \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$, we first compute $QK^\top \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. Then, we find $\exp(QK^\top) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. After that, we multiply $\exp(QK^\top) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ with the vector ${\bf 1}_n \in \mathbb{R}^n$. Finally, we use $\mathop{\mathrm{diag}}\nolimits(\cdot)$ to transform $\exp(QK^\top) {\bf 1}_n \in \mathbb{R}^n$ into a diagonal matrix, which is $D \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. In this figure, green matrices/vectors represent the terms that are given; the purple matrix represents the term after one operation; the red vector represents the term after two operations; the blue matrix represents the term after three operations.
  • Figure 4: The visualization of the simplified version of attention computation in as23bsz23 (see Eq. \ref{['eq:attention_in_AS23_BSZ23']}). Since we present the visualization of how we get $D \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ and $\exp(QK^\top) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ in Figure \ref{['fig:D']}, we regard them as given. Moreover, we are also given $V \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$. We compute their product, namely $D^{-1} \exp(Q K^\top) V \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$. In this figure, green matrices represent the terms that are given, and the purple matrix represents the term after one operation.
  • Figure 5: The visualization of the simplified version of attention computation in gsyz23_quantum (see Eq. \ref{['eq:attention_in_gsyz23a']}). Since we present the visualization of how we get $D \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ and $\exp(QK^\top) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ in Figure \ref{['fig:D']}, we regard them as given. We compute their product, namely $D^{-1} \exp(Q K^\top) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. In this figure, green matrices represent the terms that are given, and the purple matrix represents the term after one operation.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (55)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Definition 1.3: Attention Kernel Regression (or Exponential Regression)
  • Theorem 1.4: Informal Version of Theorem \ref{['thm:even']}
  • Theorem 1.5: Informal Version of Theorem \ref{['thm:odd']}
  • Theorem 1.6: Informal Version of Theorem \ref{['thm:formal_exp']}
  • Theorem 4.1: Main Result for Matrix Exponential Proxy and Even/Odd Power Regression
  • Theorem 4.2: Main Result for Attention Kernel Regression
  • Definition A.1
  • Definition A.2: Hadamard matrix
  • ...and 45 more