Crystalline representations and Wach modules in the imperfect residue field case
Abhinandan
TL;DR
This work extends Wach-module theory to the setting of an absolutely unramified base L with imperfect residue field, proving a direct equivalence between lattices inside p-adic crystalline G_L-representations and integral Wach modules for L. It introduces a Nygaard filtration framework that aligns with the filtered φ-module of the associated crystalline representation, and shows that, after inverting p, the constructions become exact, paralleling the classical perfect-residue-field theory. The strategy hinges on translating the perfect-case Wach-module machinery to the imperfect setting via (φ,Γ)-modules, overconvergent and analytic period rings, and careful control of Γ_L-actions. The results unify and extend several strands—Brinon–Trihan, Kisin-type constructions, and prismatic viewpoints—while providing explicit, constructive connections between lattices, Wach modules, and crystalline cohomology, with implications for p-adic vanishing cycles and deformation theories. These advances pave the way for a functorial deformation of D_cris in imperfect residue-field contexts and feed into subsequent work on relative Wach modules and syntomic cohomology.
Abstract
For an absolutely unramified field extension $L/\mathbb{Q}_p$ with imperfect residue field, we define and study Wach modules in the setting of $(\varphi,Γ)$-modules for $L$. Our main result establishes a direct equivalence between the category of lattices inside crystalline representations of the absolute Galois group of $L$ and the category of integral Wach modules for $L$. Moreover, we provide a direct relation between a rational Wach module equipped with the Nygaard filtration and the filtered $\varphi$-module of its associated crystalline representation.
