A Statistical Framework and Analysis for Perfect Radar Pulse Compression
Neil K. Chada, Petteri Piiroinen, Lassi Roininen
TL;DR
The paper addresses fundamental limits of perfect radar pulse compression by casting radar coding as a statistical experiment comparison problem and modeling the target with Itô measures whose structure is governed by a variance function $|\sigma|^2$. It proposes a Bayesian hierarchical framework, derives finite-dimensional conjugate updates via inverse-Wishart priors for the covariance, and extends to infinite dimensions where the posterior for $|\sigma|^2$ is non-Gaussian and characterized by generalized inverse-Wishart limits. A key result shows posterior variances for two codes with equal Fourier-modulus responses are identical, linking code design to posterior uncertainty. This work bridges radar coding and rigorous Bayesian analysis, enabling uncertainty quantification and suggesting avenues for non-Gaussian priors and distance-based comparisons for design.
Abstract
Perfect radar pulse compression coding is a potential emerging field which aims at providing rigorous analysis and fundamental limit radar experiments. It is based on finding non-trivial pulse codes, which we can make statistically equivalent, to the radar experiments carried out with elementary pulses of some shape. A common engineering-based radar experiment design, regarding pulse-compression, often omits the rigorous theory and mathematical limitations. In this work our aim is to develop a mathematical theory which coincides with understanding the radar experiment in terms of the theory of comparison of statistical experiments. We review and generalize some properties of the Itô measure. We estimate the unknown i.e. the structure function in the context of Bayesian statistical inverse problems. We study the posterior for generalized $d$-dimensional inverse problems, where we consider both real-valued and complex-valued inputs for posteriori analysis. Finally this is then extended to the infinite dimensional setting, where our analysis suggests the underlying posterior is non-Gaussian.
