Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Arithmetic progressions and holomorphic phase retrieval

Lukas Liehr

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of recovering a holomorphic function from its modulus on sampling sets, establishing a sharp rigidity criterion: a set of the form $e^{i\theta}({\mathbb{R}}+i\Lambda)$ yields uniqueness for holomorphic phase retrieval in a broad function space ${\mathcal{F}}$ containing all exponentials if and only if the index set $\Lambda$ is not contained in an arithmetic progression. The authors leverage zero-set analysis, Weierstrass factorization, and periodicity arguments to prove necessity and sufficiency, and then translate the main result into consequences for Gabor phase retrieval across spaces like $L^2(\mathbb{R}_+)$ and the Hardy/Bargmann framework, including perturbations of lattices that restore uniqueness where lattices fail. They further derive Wright-type results for families of self-adjoint operators doing phase retrieval, offering constructive pathways to Pauli-type uniqueness results. The work unifies holomorphic phase retrieval with sampling theory and transform-domain phase retrieval, demonstrating that non-AP sampling patterns (including perturbed lattices) can yield robust uniqueness guarantees in practical settings. These findings have potential implications for designing phaseless measurement schemes in time-frequency analysis and quantum-like phase problems.

Abstract

We study the determination of a holomorphic function from its absolute value. Given a parameter $θ\in \mathbb{R}$, we derive the following characterization of uniqueness in terms of rigidity of a set $Λ\subseteq \mathbb{R}$: if $\mathcal{F}$ is a vector space of entire functions containing all exponentials $e^{ξz}, \, ξ\in \mathbb{C} \setminus \{ 0 \}$, then every $F \in \mathcal{F}$ is uniquely determined up to a unimodular phase factor by $\{|F(z)| : z \in e^{iθ}(\mathbb{R} + iΛ)\}$ if and only if $Λ$ is not contained in an arithmetic progression $a\mathbb{Z}+b$. Leveraging this insight, we establish a series of consequences for Gabor phase retrieval and Pauli-type uniqueness problems. For instance, $\mathbb{Z} \times \tilde{\mathbb{Z}}$ is a uniqueness set for the Gabor phase retrieval problem in $L^2(\mathbb{R}_+)$, provided that $\tilde{\mathbb{Z}}$ is a suitable perturbation of the integers.

Arithmetic progressions and holomorphic phase retrieval

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of recovering a holomorphic function from its modulus on sampling sets, establishing a sharp rigidity criterion: a set of the form yields uniqueness for holomorphic phase retrieval in a broad function space containing all exponentials if and only if the index set is not contained in an arithmetic progression. The authors leverage zero-set analysis, Weierstrass factorization, and periodicity arguments to prove necessity and sufficiency, and then translate the main result into consequences for Gabor phase retrieval across spaces like and the Hardy/Bargmann framework, including perturbations of lattices that restore uniqueness where lattices fail. They further derive Wright-type results for families of self-adjoint operators doing phase retrieval, offering constructive pathways to Pauli-type uniqueness results. The work unifies holomorphic phase retrieval with sampling theory and transform-domain phase retrieval, demonstrating that non-AP sampling patterns (including perturbed lattices) can yield robust uniqueness guarantees in practical settings. These findings have potential implications for designing phaseless measurement schemes in time-frequency analysis and quantum-like phase problems.

Abstract

We study the determination of a holomorphic function from its absolute value. Given a parameter , we derive the following characterization of uniqueness in terms of rigidity of a set : if is a vector space of entire functions containing all exponentials , then every is uniquely determined up to a unimodular phase factor by if and only if is not contained in an arithmetic progression . Leveraging this insight, we establish a series of consequences for Gabor phase retrieval and Pauli-type uniqueness problems. For instance, is a uniqueness set for the Gabor phase retrieval problem in , provided that is a suitable perturbation of the integers.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 11 theorems, 59 equations)

This paper contains 7 sections, 11 theorems, 59 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a vector space of entire functions satisfying $\mathcal{E}({\mathbb C}^*) \subseteq {\mathcal{F}}$. Further, let $\theta \in {\mathbb R}$, and let $\Lambda \subseteq {\mathbb R}$. Then $e^{i\theta}({\mathbb R} + i \Lambda)$ is a uniqueness set for the phase retrieval problem in

Theorems & Definitions (20)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Corollary 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:main']}
  • ...and 10 more