Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the non-Transversality of the Hyperelliptic Locus and the Supersingular Locus for $g=3$

Andreas Pieper

TL;DR

This work addresses the problem of when the Newton polygon locus defined by supersingularity intersects the Torelli/Hyperelliptic locus non-transversally in genus $3$; it develops a criterion linking such non-transversal intersections to a geometric condition on a conic–line configuration arising from Li–Oort’s polarized flag-type quotients and the canonical embedding of hyperelliptic curves. The main method combines Dieudonné theory, the Kodaira–Spencer map, and explicit analysis of Li–Oort families to translate deformation-theoretic data into a tangible geometric test: a line $l$ touching a conic $Q$ at a point $P$ corresponds to non-transversality. In the special case $a(\mathrm{Jac}(C))=1$, the criterion simplifies to a Cartier–Manin matrix condition, enabling an explicit, algorithmic construction of examples, including infinite CM-reduction families. The results illuminate how non-transversal intersections arise already in the simplest nontrivial case $g=3$, with potential implications for understanding the interaction between Newton polygon strata and curve loci in higher genus and providing practical tools for constructing and verifying such points via $p$-adic and CM techniques.

Abstract

This paper gives a criterion for a moduli point to be a point of non-transversal intersection of the hyperelliptic locus and the supersingular locus in the Siegel moduli stack $\mathfrak{A}_3 \times \mathbb{F}_p$. It is shown that for infinitely many primes $p$ there exists such a point.

On the non-Transversality of the Hyperelliptic Locus and the Supersingular Locus for $g=3$

TL;DR

This work addresses the problem of when the Newton polygon locus defined by supersingularity intersects the Torelli/Hyperelliptic locus non-transversally in genus ; it develops a criterion linking such non-transversal intersections to a geometric condition on a conic–line configuration arising from Li–Oort’s polarized flag-type quotients and the canonical embedding of hyperelliptic curves. The main method combines Dieudonné theory, the Kodaira–Spencer map, and explicit analysis of Li–Oort families to translate deformation-theoretic data into a tangible geometric test: a line touching a conic at a point corresponds to non-transversality. In the special case , the criterion simplifies to a Cartier–Manin matrix condition, enabling an explicit, algorithmic construction of examples, including infinite CM-reduction families. The results illuminate how non-transversal intersections arise already in the simplest nontrivial case , with potential implications for understanding the interaction between Newton polygon strata and curve loci in higher genus and providing practical tools for constructing and verifying such points via -adic and CM techniques.

Abstract

This paper gives a criterion for a moduli point to be a point of non-transversal intersection of the hyperelliptic locus and the supersingular locus in the Siegel moduli stack . It is shown that for infinitely many primes there exists such a point.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 19 theorems, 127 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 16 sections, 19 theorems, 127 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem A

The following are equivalent:

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Generic picture
  • Figure 2: CM touchpoint

Theorems & Definitions (46)

  • Theorem A
  • Theorem B
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Definition 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3
  • proof
  • Definition 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • proof
  • ...and 36 more