The Rhie-Chow stabilized Box Method for the Stokes problem
G. Negrini, N. Parolini, M. Verani
TL;DR
The paper develops the Rhie-Chow stabilized Box Method (RCBM) for the steady Stokes problem by embedding Rhie-Chow stabilization into the Box Method on a Voronoi dual mesh, and provides both empirical convergence data in 2D/3D and a theoretical analysis of well-posedness and convergence under conjectured stabilization properties. It shows that the discrete problem is stable and convergent under a set of properties for the stabilization (consistency, continuity, coercivity, inf-sup), supported numerically and framed as conjectures. Numerical experiments with OpenFOAM confirm a linear-in-$h$ convergence rate for velocity in $H^1$ and pressure in $L^2$, and the theory links these results to a variational formulation that parallels FEM discretizations. The work enables a robust, locally conservative finite-volume-like scheme for Stokes (and potentially Navier–Stokes) on general polyhedral meshes and connects practical CFD implementations (OpenFOAM) with a solid variational framework.
Abstract
The Finite Volume method (FVM) is widely adopted in many different applications because of its built-in conservation properties, its ability to deal with arbitrary mesh and its computational efficiency. In this work, we consider the Rhie-Chow stabilized Box Method (RCBM) for the approximation of the Stokes problem. The Box Method (BM) is a piecewise linear Petrov-Galerkin formulation on the Voronoi dual mesh of a Delaunay triangulation, whereas the Rhie-Chow (RC) stabilization is a well known stabilization technique for FVM. The first part of the paper provides a variational formulation of the RC stabilization and discusses the validity of crucial properties relevant for the well-posedeness and convergence of RCBM. Moreover, a numerical exploration of the convergence properties of the method on 2D and 3D test cases is presented. The last part of the paper considers the theoretically justification of the well-posedeness of RCBM and the experimentally observed convergence rates. This latter justification hinges upon suitable assumptions, whose validity is numerically explored.
