Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On interdependence of instabilities and average drop sizes in bag breakup

Varun Kulkarni, Nikhil Shirdade, Neil Rodrigues, Vishnu Radhakrishna, Paul E. Sojka

Abstract

A drop exposed to cross flow of air experiences sudden accelerations which deform it rapidly ultimately proceeding to disintegrate it into smaller fragments. In this work, we examine the breakup of a drop as a bag film with a bounding rim resulting from acceleration induced Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities and characterized through the Weber number, \textit{We}, representative of the competition between the disruptive aerodynamic force imparting acceleration and the restorative surface tension force. Our analysis reveals a previously overlooked parabolic dependence ($\sim We^2$) of the combination of dimensionless instability wavelengths $({\barλ}_{bag}^2/ {\barλ}_{rim}^4 {\barλ}_{film})$ developing on different segments of the deforming drop. Further, we extend these findings to deduce the dependence of the average dimensionless drop sizes for the rim, $\langle{\bar{D}}_{rim}\rangle$ and bag film, $\langle{\bar{D}}_{film}\rangle$ individually, on $We$ and see them to decrease linearly for the rim ($\sim We^{-1}$) and quadratically for the bag film ($\sim We^{-2}$). The reported work is expected to have far-reaching implications as it provides unique insights on destabilization and disintegration mechanisms based on theoretical scaling arguments involving the commonly encountered canonical geometries of a toroidal rim and a curved liquid film.

On interdependence of instabilities and average drop sizes in bag breakup

Abstract

A drop exposed to cross flow of air experiences sudden accelerations which deform it rapidly ultimately proceeding to disintegrate it into smaller fragments. In this work, we examine the breakup of a drop as a bag film with a bounding rim resulting from acceleration induced Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities and characterized through the Weber number, \textit{We}, representative of the competition between the disruptive aerodynamic force imparting acceleration and the restorative surface tension force. Our analysis reveals a previously overlooked parabolic dependence () of the combination of dimensionless instability wavelengths developing on different segments of the deforming drop. Further, we extend these findings to deduce the dependence of the average dimensionless drop sizes for the rim, and bag film, individually, on and see them to decrease linearly for the rim () and quadratically for the bag film (). The reported work is expected to have far-reaching implications as it provides unique insights on destabilization and disintegration mechanisms based on theoretical scaling arguments involving the commonly encountered canonical geometries of a toroidal rim and a curved liquid film.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 7 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 4 sections, 7 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: (a) (i) Initial undeformed drop (diameter, $D_0$) before it enters the air stream blowing from left to right and shown by hollow block arrows (ii) Flattening of the drop into a disc-like shape of cross stream dimension, $D_{bag}$ due to air impact and flattening in the radial (r) and streamwise (z) direction (iii) Incipience of Rayleigh-Taylor instability on $D_{bag}$ due streamwise acceleration, $\xi_{bag}$ and separation of drop into two distinct length scales, $h_{rim}$, and $h_{film}$ with $h_{rim}$ also accelerated radially, $\xi_{rim}$ (shown by blue arrows) (iv) Acceleration, $\xi_{film}$ of finite thickness ($h_{film}$) curved film (shown by blue arrows) (v) Instabilities on curved bag film due to radial acceleration, $\xi_{film}$ (vi) Bursting of curved liquid bag film (vii) Fragmentation of rim (b) 3D rendering of discoid (left) with the cut section (right) showing the different length scales, $h_{rim}$, $D_{bag}$ and $h_{film}$ (c) Illustration showing the approximation of the unstable curved film to one with flat interfaces since radius of the film, $\textcolor{black}{R_{film}} >> h_{rim}$, refer (a)-(v) (d) Schematic showing waves on rim, $\lambda_{rim}$ from z direction, refer (a)-(vi). Image sequence corresponds to $We \approx 16$ and 40% by weight glycerine-water solution. Dashed black line shows the trajectory of the deforming drop.
  • Figure 2: Relation between the Rayleigh-Taylor instability dimensionless wavelengths on the drop (${\bar{\lambda}}_{bag}$), rim (${\bar{\lambda}}_{rim}$) and curved film (${\bar{\lambda}}_{film}$) with $We$ on log-log scale with an $R^2 \approx 0.97$. Inset shows $\forall_{rim}/ \forall_{film} \approx$ constant across all $We$ accompanied by a sketch to show accurate calculation of $\forall_{film}$ by considering difference between $\forall_{drop}$ and $\forall_{rim}$.
  • Figure 3: (a) Initial bag (t = 12 ms) with formation of hole (t = 14 ms) triggering retraction of the curved film to form a "rolling rim" (t = 17 ms) which forms ligaments shedding droplets, zoomed view in dotted box (b) Schematic of curved bag film bursting leading to drop production (i) Initial curved film of radius, $R_{film}$ with a hole and rolling toroidal rim (ii) Approximation of the curved film as a flat sheet since $R_{film} >> h_{film}$ (iii) Formation of drops of size, $\langle D_{film}\rangle$ from ligaments of size, $d_{lig}$ produced from the rolling rim of diameter, $d_{roll}$ (c) Rim distortions of wavelength $\lambda_{rim}$ after bursting of the curved film (t = 24 ms) followed by emergence of bulbous regions due to capillary instability (t = 28 ms) finally resulting in a ring of spherical drops (t = 32 ms) (d) Schematic of rim breakup into drops (i) Approximation of toroidal ring as a flat interface since $h_{rim} << R_{max}$ (ii) Volume in one wavelength, $\lambda_{rim}$ equated to that of drops of average diameter, $\langle D_{rim}\rangle$. Test conditions, 50% glycerine-water, $We \approx 16$.
  • Figure 4: Rim and bag drop sizes as a function $We$ derived theoretically in eqns \ref{['Eq5']} and \ref{['Eq6']} on semi-log scale. The average rim drops sizes, $\langle\overline{D}_{rim}\rangle$ decrease linearly whereas the average curved film sizes, $\langle\overline{D}_{film}\rangle$ decrease quadratically. Legend is same as Fig. \ref{['Fig2']}
  • Figure :