Improving Reliable Navigation under Uncertainty via Predictions Informed by Non-Local Information
Raihan Islam Arnob, Gregory J. Stein
TL;DR
This work addresses reliable long-horizon navigation under uncertainty in partially mapped environments by enabling predictions about unseen space that incorporate non-local information. It extends the Learning over Subgoals (LSP) planning framework with a Graph Neural Network (GNN) backbone, forming LSP-GNN, which operates on a skeleton-based graph of the environment to predict subgoal properties $P_S$, $R_S$, and $R_E$ and thus informs high-level planning. The method preserves reliability guarantees while achieving significant performance gains across three challenging environments, including large-scale university floorplans, with improvements up to 14.9% over local-information baselines. This approach demonstrates that maintaining non-local knowledge via structured graph representations can markedly enhance building-scale navigation under uncertainty, with potential for richer sensory integration in future work.
Abstract
We improve reliable, long-horizon, goal-directed navigation in partially-mapped environments by using non-locally available information to predict the goodness of temporally-extended actions that enter unseen space. Making predictions about where to navigate in general requires non-local information: any observations the robot has seen so far may provide information about the goodness of a particular direction of travel. Building on recent work in learning-augmented model-based planning under uncertainty, we present an approach that can both rely on non-local information to make predictions (via a graph neural network) and is reliable by design: it will always reach its goal, even when learning does not provide accurate predictions. We conduct experiments in three simulated environments in which non-local information is needed to perform well. In our large scale university building environment, generated from real-world floorplans to the scale, we demonstrate a 9.3\% reduction in cost-to-go compared to a non-learned baseline and a 14.9\% reduction compared to a learning-informed planner that can only use local information to inform its predictions.
