Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Singular matroid realization spaces

Daniel Corey, Dante Luber

TL;DR

This paper determines the smoothness landscape of matroid realization spaces for small rank, proving that all complex realizable rank-$3$ spaces on at most $11$ elements are smooth while constructing singular examples at $n=12$, and showing smoothness for rank-$4$ spaces with up to $9$ elements. It develops a robust framework combining matroid operations, coordinate-ring presentations, and principal extensions to propagate smoothness and irreducibility from smaller ground sets, complemented by extensive computer-aided verification. A central application is that the open Grassmannian $\mathsf{Gr}^{\circ}(3,n;\mathbb{C})$ is not schön for $n\ge 12$, via singular initial degenerations linked to specific rank-$3$ matroids; the work also connects these phenomena to flag varieties and paving matroids through a systematic study of initial degenerations and hypersimplices. Overall, the results illuminate Mnëv-type universality in concrete, small-scale settings and provide computational tools and criteria for detecting singularity and non-schönness in Grassmannian-related spaces.

Abstract

We study smoothness of realization spaces of matroids for small rank and ground set. For $\mathbb{C}$-realizable matroids, when the rank is $3$, we prove that the realization spaces are all smooth when the ground set has $11$ or fewer elements, and there are singular realization spaces for $12$ and greater elements. For rank $4$ and $9$ or fewer elements, we prove that these realization spaces are smooth. As an application, we prove that $\text{Gr}^{\circ}(3,n;\mathbb{C})$ -- the locus of the Grassmannian where all Plücker coordinates are nonzero -- is not schön for $n\geq 12$.

Singular matroid realization spaces

TL;DR

This paper determines the smoothness landscape of matroid realization spaces for small rank, proving that all complex realizable rank- spaces on at most elements are smooth while constructing singular examples at , and showing smoothness for rank- spaces with up to elements. It develops a robust framework combining matroid operations, coordinate-ring presentations, and principal extensions to propagate smoothness and irreducibility from smaller ground sets, complemented by extensive computer-aided verification. A central application is that the open Grassmannian is not schön for , via singular initial degenerations linked to specific rank- matroids; the work also connects these phenomena to flag varieties and paving matroids through a systematic study of initial degenerations and hypersimplices. Overall, the results illuminate Mnëv-type universality in concrete, small-scale settings and provide computational tools and criteria for detecting singularity and non-schönness in Grassmannian-related spaces.

Abstract

We study smoothness of realization spaces of matroids for small rank and ground set. For -realizable matroids, when the rank is , we prove that the realization spaces are all smooth when the ground set has or fewer elements, and there are singular realization spaces for and greater elements. For rank and or fewer elements, we prove that these realization spaces are smooth. As an application, we prove that -- the locus of the Grassmannian where all Plücker coordinates are nonzero -- is not schön for .
Paper Structure (19 sections, 34 theorems, 96 equations, 3 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 19 sections, 34 theorems, 96 equations, 3 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

The realization spaces of $\mathbb{C}$-realizable rank $3$ matroids on 11 or fewer elements are smooth over $\mathbb{C}$.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 2.1: A projective realization of the $(3,9)$--matroid from Example \ref{['ex:3-9']}
  • Figure 3.1: A special and a general configuration of points in $\mathbb{P}^{3}$ realizing the matroid from Example \ref{['ex:morphismNotSmooth']}
  • Figure 4.1: Projective realization of $\mathsf{Q}_{\mathsf{sing}}$

Theorems & Definitions (59)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Example 2.1
  • Proposition 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • Proposition 3.3
  • Lemma 3.4
  • proof : Proof of Proposition \ref{['prop:principalExtension']}
  • ...and 49 more