Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Weak solutions to the heat conducting compressible self-gravitating flows in time-dependent domains

Kuntal Bhandari, Bingkang Huang, Šárka Nečasová

TL;DR

The paper proves the global-in-time existence of weak solutions to the heat-conducting compressible self-gravitating fluids in a time-dependent domain governed by the Navier–Stokes–Fourier–Poisson system. The authors develop a penalization framework to handle moving boundaries, mollify coefficients, and introduce artificial pressure and ballistic energy to control boundary heat flux, density, and temperature. They establish uniform a priori bounds and perform a sequence of limit passages (first in the boundary-penalization parameter, then in mollification and penalty parameters) to obtain a weak solution in the original moving domain that satisfies a ballistic energy inequality. The approach extends the NSF–Poisson theory to moving domains with nonhomogeneous boundary heat flux, providing a rigorous foundation for modeling viscous, heat-conducting self-gravitating fluids such as gaseous stars under time-dependent geometry.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the heat-conducting compressible self-gravitating fluids in time-dependent domains, which typically describe the motion of viscous gaseous stars. The flow is governed by the 3-D Navier-Stokes-Fourier-Poisson equations where the velocity is supposed to fulfil the full-slip boundary condition and the temperature on the boundary is given by a non-homogeneous Dirichlet condition. We establish the global-in-time weak solution to the system. Our approach is based on the penalization of the boundary behavior, viscosity, and the pressure in the weak formulation. Moreover, to accommodate the non-homogeneous boundary heat flux, the concept of {\em ballistic energy} is utilized in this work.

Weak solutions to the heat conducting compressible self-gravitating flows in time-dependent domains

TL;DR

The paper proves the global-in-time existence of weak solutions to the heat-conducting compressible self-gravitating fluids in a time-dependent domain governed by the Navier–Stokes–Fourier–Poisson system. The authors develop a penalization framework to handle moving boundaries, mollify coefficients, and introduce artificial pressure and ballistic energy to control boundary heat flux, density, and temperature. They establish uniform a priori bounds and perform a sequence of limit passages (first in the boundary-penalization parameter, then in mollification and penalty parameters) to obtain a weak solution in the original moving domain that satisfies a ballistic energy inequality. The approach extends the NSF–Poisson theory to moving domains with nonhomogeneous boundary heat flux, providing a rigorous foundation for modeling viscous, heat-conducting self-gravitating fluids such as gaseous stars under time-dependent geometry.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the heat-conducting compressible self-gravitating fluids in time-dependent domains, which typically describe the motion of viscous gaseous stars. The flow is governed by the 3-D Navier-Stokes-Fourier-Poisson equations where the velocity is supposed to fulfil the full-slip boundary condition and the temperature on the boundary is given by a non-homogeneous Dirichlet condition. We establish the global-in-time weak solution to the system. Our approach is based on the penalization of the boundary behavior, viscosity, and the pressure in the weak formulation. Moreover, to accommodate the non-homogeneous boundary heat flux, the concept of {\em ballistic energy} is utilized in this work.
Paper Structure (26 sections, 4 theorems, 206 equations)

This paper contains 26 sections, 4 theorems, 206 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

Assume that $\Omega_0 \subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is a bounded domain of the class $\mathcal{C}^{2+\nu_0}$ for some $\nu_0>0$ and, suppose that $\mathbf{V}\in \mathcal{C}^1([0,T]; \mathcal{C}^3_c(\mathbb{R}^3;\mathbb{R}^3))$ satisfying trajec-eq and the hypothesis in subsection Section-hypothesis are sati

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Definition 4.1
  • Theorem 4.2
  • proof
  • Remark 1
  • Lemma A.1: Generalized Poincaré inequality
  • Lemma A.2: Korn-Poincaré inequality