Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$Σ_1$ gaps as derived models and correctness of mice

Farmer Schlutzenberg, John Steel

TL;DR

The paper investigates $Σ_1$ gaps in $L(\mathbb{R})$ under $ZF+AD+V=L(R)$, framing $J_{β}(\mathbb{R})$ as a derived model of a premouse appearing in a generic extension and introducing the $\mathscr{M}$-hierarchy to realize these derived models within the codes. It develops inner-model techniques (tame projecting mice, P-construction, and mouse witnesses) to analyze the start and progression through admissible gaps, and constructs a systematic hierarchy to capture ordinal definability and definability hierarchies in this setting. A central goal is to advance a weak version of the Rudominer–Steel conjectures, showing that certain derived-model realizations exist and are definable under ω1-existence and related closure properties, and extending these insights through both admissible gaps and generic extensions. The work combines fine-structure, forcing, and iteration techniques to link derived models of premice with $L(\,\mathbb{R}\,)$-hierarchies, potentially resolving aspects of how $L(\mathbb{R})$-like universes arise as derived models of generic mice. The results provide a framework for identifying wellfounded derived models in the codes and for connecting these to the corresponding OT structures under determinacy hypotheses, with implications for the Rudominer–Steel theory of $L(\mathbb{R})$ in inner model theory.

Abstract

Assume ZF + AD + V=L(R). Let $[α,β]$ be a $Σ_1$ gap with $J_α(R)$ admissible. We analyze $J_β(R)$ as a natural form of "derived model" of a premouse $P$, where $P$ is found in a generic extension of $V$. In particular, we will have $\mathcal{P}(R)\cap J_β(R)=\mathcal{P}(R)\cap D$, and if $J_β(R)\models$ "$Θ$ exists", then $J_β(R)$ and $D$ in fact have the same universe. This analysis will be employed in further work, yet to appear, toward a resolution of a conjecture of Rudominer and Steel on the nature of $(L(R))^M$, for $ω$-small mice $M$. We also establish some preliminary work toward this conjecture in the present paper.

$Σ_1$ gaps as derived models and correctness of mice

TL;DR

The paper investigates gaps in under , framing as a derived model of a premouse appearing in a generic extension and introducing the -hierarchy to realize these derived models within the codes. It develops inner-model techniques (tame projecting mice, P-construction, and mouse witnesses) to analyze the start and progression through admissible gaps, and constructs a systematic hierarchy to capture ordinal definability and definability hierarchies in this setting. A central goal is to advance a weak version of the Rudominer–Steel conjectures, showing that certain derived-model realizations exist and are definable under ω1-existence and related closure properties, and extending these insights through both admissible gaps and generic extensions. The work combines fine-structure, forcing, and iteration techniques to link derived models of premice with -hierarchies, potentially resolving aspects of how -like universes arise as derived models of generic mice. The results provide a framework for identifying wellfounded derived models in the codes and for connecting these to the corresponding OT structures under determinacy hypotheses, with implications for the Rudominer–Steel theory of in inner model theory.

Abstract

Assume ZF + AD + V=L(R). Let be a gap with admissible. We analyze as a natural form of "derived model" of a premouse , where is found in a generic extension of . In particular, we will have , and if " exists", then and in fact have the same universe. This analysis will be employed in further work, yet to appear, toward a resolution of a conjecture of Rudominer and Steel on the nature of , for -small mice . We also establish some preliminary work toward this conjecture in the present paper.
Paper Structure (24 sections, 84 theorems, 299 equations)

This paper contains 24 sections, 84 theorems, 299 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1.6

For $x\in\mathbb R$ and $(\alpha,m),(\beta,n)\in\mathrm{Lim}_{0}\times[1,\omega)$ and $(\alpha,m)\leq_\mathrm{lex}(\beta,n)$, we have:

Theorems & Definitions (313)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Remark 1.3
  • Definition 1.5
  • Lemma 1.6
  • proof
  • Lemma 1.7
  • proof
  • Conjecture 1.8: Steel
  • Conjecture 1.9: Steel
  • Conjecture 1.10: Rudominer, Steel, 1999
  • ...and 303 more